----------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------
year 5, Issue 2 (Fall & Winter 2020)                   CIAUJ 2020, 5(2): 167-182 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Saba S. Applying the Islamic Realism to Conceiving the Human Values of Place in Architecture. CIAUJ. 2020; 5 (2) :167-182
URL: http://ciauj-tabriziau.ir/article-1-266-en.html
Guilan University , saman.saba.64@gmail.com
Abstract:   (3180 Views)
Transition in contemporary human life has led to the introduction of new concepts in various aspects of his life, including his relationship with the environment, and at the same rethinking old concepts is inevitable. In this regard, in recent years, more attention has been paid to Islamic realism to provide a new interpretation of Islamic architecture. However, the lack of proper development of the basic concepts of architecture and the lack of attention to the basic features and distinctions of realism has led to more relatively literalist results than such an approach to the development of architectural knowledge as applied knowledge. Overcoming this shortcoming requires attention to redefining the basic concepts of architecture based on the spirit of Islamic realism before entering into more detailed theories. Among these, the concept of place can be considered as one of the critical concepts due to the existing phenomenological definitions and in contrast to realism. If we consider the place as the result of a process of human-environment interaction, this interaction, like any interaction, is based on more fundamental concepts that are considered as the values by many thinkers. Accordingly, in this study, by fundamentally refining the realistic approach and highlighting its distinction from other approaches, the context has been laid down to redefine the fundamental concepts that shape human-environment interaction and ultimately lead to the emergence of place. In this way, the question arises as to how the realist approach defines the values that shape the place, and accordingly, how is the way of recognizing these values according to the sources of knowledge acquisition? Thus, according to the research approach and its philosophical nature, this paper follows the method of logical reasoning as the main approach and tries to gradually reach the main discussions by proposing a large-scale discussion. Based on what has been discussed in this process, Islamic realism in architecture is a perspective based on essentialist ontology, realist epistemology, and deductive methodology. Value in place is also debatable at four levels: form, substance, procedure, and facet. Place at the fourth level has concepts of value in the form of value structure that can be recognized only by observing the real-life of man in the individual and social dimension. The landscape is considered to be the largest field of observation and recognition of these values in the place and by accepting realism as an approach dominating the various pillars of knowledge, understanding and receiving these values can be understood only by studying human actions in shaping the environment and, there is no way to argue that. Accordingly, this research draws a framework in understanding the values ​​of place that according to the reality of human-environment interaction, explaining both the continuity of value structures and its evolution and dynamism concerning contemporary developments. In this structure, they construct and co-operate on human actions in interaction with the environment and shaping place. Accordingly, the realistic values ​​of place in the landscape are true both in its continuity and in its dynamics, and therefore realism in knowing the place requires the acceptance of both aspects of structuration and change of values. From this point of view, the realistic approach in architecture is not a reactionary view in the confrontation between Islamic culture and the West, but a new approach has been developed to respond to theoretical deficiencies in built-environmental sciences.
Full-Text [PDF 1056 kb]   (417 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research |
Received: 2020/10/26 | Accepted: 2020/12/28 | ePublished: 2021/02/16

References
1. Amoli Larijani. S. 1991. Religious knowledge. Tehran: Book Translation and Publishing Center. [In Persian]
2. Ardalan, nader and laleh bakhtiar, 2011, sense of unity, Tehran, Elm-e-Memar. [In Persian]
3. Bell, Simon. 2012. Landscape: Pattern, Perception and Process. Landscape: Pattern Perception and Process. Taylor and Francis. [DOI:10.4324/9780203120088]
4. Benson, John F., and Maggie H. Roe. 2005. Landscape and Sustainability. Landscape and Sustainability. Taylor & Francis. [DOI:10.4324/9780203995785]
5. Blaikie, Norman W. H. 1993. Approaches to Social Enquiry. Polity Press.
6. Bryant, Christopher. 2014. Giddens' Theory of Structuration. Giddens' Theory of Structuration. Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9781315822556]
7. Casey, Edward S. 1993. Getting Back into Place: Toward a Renewed Understanding of the Place-World. Indiana University Press.
8. Chalbi. Maseoud. 2010. Sociology of order: Theoretical Description and Analysis of Social Order. Tehran: Ney. [In Persian]
9. Cohen. Bruce J. 1993. Principles of Sociology. Translated by G.A. Tavasouli & Reza Fazel. Tehran: Samt. [In Persian]
10. Cosgrove, Denis E. 1998. Social Formation and Symbolic Landscape. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.New York: Taylor & Francis e-Library. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203875001 [DOI:10.4324/9780203875001.]
11. Dadjoo. Ebrahim. 2018. New essentialism in the philosophy of contemporary science (an important but unfamiliar trend in contemporary Iran). Zehn 19(74):50-82. [In Persian]
12. Dadjoo. Ebrahim. 2019. Realism in the study of modern Islamic civilization. Journal of Fundamental Studies of the New Islamic Civilization 2(1): 65-100. [In Persian]
13. Dadjoo. Ebrahim. 2020. Realism in Islamic Humanities. Tehran: Institute of Islamic Culture and Thought. [In Persian]
14. Delfosse. Olivier. 1992. Geographical space. Translated by Sirous Sahami. Tehran: Nika [In Persian]
15. Durant. Will. 1997. The Pleasures of Philosophy. Translated by Zaryab khoie. Tehran: Scientific and cultural publications. [In Persian]
16. Ellis. Brian. 2020. Scientific Essentialism. Translated by Ebrahim Dadjoo. Tehran: Research Institute for Islamic Culture and Thought. [In Persian]
17. Fay. Brian. 2005. Contemporary Philosophy of Social Science: A Multicultural Approach 2th Edition. Translated by Khashayar Deihimi. Tehran: Tarh-e no. [In Persian]
18. Feather, Norman T. 1975. Values in Education and Society Norman T. Feather.
19. Firestone, Sarah Elizabeth, and Richard E Clark. 2003. Value Change: Conscious Cognitive Dissonance or Automated Process? University of the Southern California.
20. Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1975. "Hermeneutics and Social Science." Cultural Hermeneutics 2 (4): 307-16. [DOI:10.1177/019145377500200402]
21. Gharehbaglou, M., Motalebi, G., Saba, S. 2019. Recognizing the Concept of Value in Human-Environment Relations in Open Spaces for Traditional Iranian Residential Buildings. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba: Memary Va Shahrsazi. 24(1): 101-114. doi: 10.22059/jfaup.2019.270845.672174
22. Giddens, Anthony. 1983. "Comments on the Theory of Structuration." Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 13 (1): 75-80. [DOI:10.1111/j.1468-5914.1983.tb00463.x]
23. Giddens. A. 2005. Central Issues in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Mohammad Rezaei Translation, Saad Publishing. [In Persian]
24. Grütter, Jörg Kurt. 1987. "Ästhetik Der Architektur Grundlagen der Architektur-Wahrnehmung."
25. Gunnell, Martin J. 2007. Global Cultural Values Change and the Relationship with Telecommunications Change: A Longitudinal Analysis. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences. Vol. 68. Capella University.
26. Haruna, Peter Fuseini. 2008. "Book Review: Culture, Development, and Public Administration in Africa by Ogwo J. Umeh and Greg Andranovich." Administrative Theory & Praxis 30 (1): 143-47. [DOI:10.1080/10841806.2008.11029622]
27. Hasani, S. H. R., and H, Mousavi. 2012. Constructing and Factoring in Credit Theories of Allameh Tabataba'i and Giddens's Constructive Theory, Do Faslnameh Naziehaye Ejtemaii Motafakkeran Eslam 2(2):129-159. [In Persian]
28. Hasani. Abolhasan. 2011. Hekmat-e Siasi-e Motaallie. Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. [In Persian]
29. Inglehart, Ronald, and Gabriela Catterberg. 2002. "Trends in Political Action: The Developmental Trend and the Post-Honeymoon Decline." International Journal of Comparative Sociology 43 (3-5): 300-316. [DOI:10.1177/002071520204300305]
30. Inglehart, Ronald, and Wayne E Baker. 2000. "Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values." American Sociological Review, 19-51. [DOI:10.2307/2657288]
31. Javadi Amoli. Abdollah. 2014. Right and Duty in Islam. Edited by Hossein Shafiei. Qom: Sadra. [In Persian]
32. Kilminster, Richard. 2006. "Structuration Theory as a World-View," November, 131-60.
33. Laland, K.N., and Luke Rendell. 2010. "Social Learning: Theory." In Encyclopedia of Animal Behavior, 380-86. Elsevier. [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-813251-7.00057-2]
34. Lieberman, Matthew D, Kevin N Ochsner, Daniel T Gilbert, and Daniel L Schacter. 2001. "Do Amnesics Exhibit Cognitive Dissonance Reduction? The Role of Explicit Memory and Attention in Attitude Change." Psychological Science 12 (2): 135-40. [DOI:10.1111/1467-9280.00323]
35. Mannheim, Karl. 1960. Ideology and Utopia. London: Routledge.
36. Mansouri. A. 2004. Pessimistic induction and scientific realism. Zehn 5(19):3-10. [In Persian]
37. McCoy, Terry. 2019. "Globalization and the Caribbean: Reconsidering the Options." The Dialectics of Globalization, 201-24. [DOI:10.4324/9780429310010-11]
38. Mesbahyazdi. Muhammadtaghi. 2012. Society and history from the perspective of the Qur'an. Tehran: Amirkabir. [In Persian]
39. Mesbahyazdi. Muhammadtaghi. 2013. The relationship Between Science and Religion. Qom: Imam Khomeini Educational and Research Institute. [In Persian]
40. Motahari. M. Tabatabai, M.H. 1985. Principles of Philosophy and the Method of Realism. Vol. II. Tehran: Sadra. [In Persian]
41. Motahari. Morteza. 2019. Islamic movements in the last hundred years. Tehran: Sadra. [In Persian]
42. Mottaghifar. Gholamreza. Mesbahyazdi. Muhammadtaghi. 1997. Prerequisites of Islamic management. Qom: Imam Khomeini Educational and Research Institute. [In Persian]
43. Naghib Atas. S.M. 1995. An Introduction to Islamic Cosmology. Tehran: Institute of Islamic Studies, University of Tehran. [In Persian]
44. Nikgohar.A. 1990. Fundamentals of Sociology and Introduction to Classical Sociological Research. Tehran: Rayzan. [In Persian]
45. Noghrehkar. A.H. 2014. Human perceptual interaction with spatial-geometric ideas in architecture. Qom: AmirKabir. [In Persian]
46. Norberg-Schulz, Christian. 1977. Architecture: Presence, Language, Place. Michigan: The University of Michigan.
47. Panahi, Hasan, Khosroupanah. Abdolhosein. 2009. Sadra Epistemological System. Tehran: Publishing Organization of the Institute of Islamic Culture and Thought. [In Persian]
48. Parsons, Talcott. 1951. The Social System. New York: Routledge & Keygan Paul Ltd.
49. Pezeshgi. Mohammad. 2020. Realism (Its Concept and Weight in the Transcendental Civil Theosophy). Hekmat-e-Islami 6(23):89-108. [In Persian]
50. Psillos, Stathis. 2009. Knowing the Structure of Nature: Essays on Realism and Explanation. Knowing the Structure of Nature: Essays on Realism and Explanation. Palgrave Macmillan.
51. Rapoport, Amos. 1977. Human Aspects of Urban Form. Towards a Man-Environment Approach Yo Urban Form and Design. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
52. Relph, E. C. 2008. Place and Placelessness. Pion.
53. Rezaei. R. 2004. Inference aimed at the best explanation and justification of propositions related to the outside world. Maerefat-e Falsafi. 6(2):61-96. [In Persian]
54. Rice, Mitchell F. 2007. "A Post-Modern Cultural Competency Framework for Public Administration and Public Service Delivery." International Journal of Public Sector Management 20 (7): 622-37. [DOI:10.1108/09513550710823524]
55. Ritzer, George. 2003. Major Contemporary Social Theorists. Malden: Blackwell Pubishing.
56. Saba. S. 2020. Role of Human Values in Assessment of Place Creating Processes in Residential Open Spaces, Case study of Tabriz. PhD Thesis. Tabriz Islamic Art University.
57. Sadeghi. Reza. 2010. Realism and its Criteria. Falsafe-ie Din. 7(6): 187-212. [In Persian]
58. Sankey, Howard. 2012. Scientific Realism and the Rationality of Science. Scientific Realism and the Rationality of Science.
59. Sayer. Andrew. 2006. Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach. Translated by Emad Afrough.Tehran: Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies. [In Persian]
60. Seyedkalal S, Pourdeihimi S. 2012.Landscape Space: Integration of Culture and Nature. JHRE. 31 (138) :17-28. [In Persian]
61. Skidmore, William L., and Jonathan H. Turner. 1975. The Structure of Sociology Theory. Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers Canadiens de Sociologie. Vol. 1. Belmont: Wadsworth. [DOI:10.2307/3340022]
62. Soroush. Abdolkarim. 2007. The Restless Nature of the World. Tehran: Serat. [In Persian]
63. Steele, F. 1996. The Sense of Place. Boston: CBI Publishing Company.
64. Tabatabai, M.H. 2008. Collection of treatises of Allameh Tabatabai. Qom: Boostan-e Ketab. [In Persian]
65. Tabatabai, M.H. 2017. Principles of Philosophy and the Method of Realism Vol. I. Tehran: Sadra. [In Persian]
66. Turner. J.H. 1998. Sociology: Concepts and Uses. Translated by M. Fouladi & M.A. Bakhtiari. Tehran: Imam Khomeini Institute. [In Persian]
67. Warnock, G. J. 1967. Contemporary Moral Philosophy. Macmillan Education, Limited. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-349-00332-7]
68. Welzel, Christian, and Ronald Inglehart. 2007. "Modernization." Cultural Change and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence (Cambridge and Massachusetts: Cambridge University Press, 2005)
69. ---. 2009. Mass Beliefs and Democratic Institutions." In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2021 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Culture of Islamic Architecture and Urbanism Journal

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb