----------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------
year 7, Issue 2 (Semi-Annual 2022)                   CIAUJ 2022, 7(2): 181-192 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

rajabi F. Explaining the Architectural Quality Model of Neighborhood Space to Improve Social Capital. CIAUJ 2022; 7 (2) :181-192
URL: http://ciauj-tabriziau.ir/article-1-434-en.html
Faculty of Architecture and Art, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran , f.rajabi@pnu.ac.ir
Abstract:   (730 Views)
The physical space in the neighborhood is the bed of social activities in the social relations of the neighborhood. On the one hand, this space is formed during social relations, therefore, the architecture of the physical space and social relations are in a two-way relationship. On the other hand, social relations are the primary core of forming and strengthening social capital. Therefore, the architecture of the physical space is effective in the formation and strengthening of social capital, and not paying attention to it leads to many social problems, including reducing social participation, lack of security, increasing criminality, and finally, the loss of satisfaction and a sense of being pointed out. Today, despite the efforts of specialists to create sociable physical spaces, social relations have not expanded significantly, and following this reduction of relations, social capital has been in a downward trend. There has been no formation and strengthening of social relations in the neighborhood, and the decrease in presence in the neighborhood has led to a decrease in the possibility of social relations and ultimately an unprecedented decrease in local social capital. The review of the literature on the subject shows a lack of agreement between the most desirable physical space to promote social capital, so the purpose of this research is to explain a model of the architectural qualities of physical space at the neighborhood scale that will promote local social capital and reduce social problems, more precisely, the main question of the research is about the physical aspects of the neighborhood space, through which the social capital of the neighborhood is formed and increased. In this regard, to formulate the theoretical framework of the research, the theoretical texts related to social capital and the architecture of the body of space are examined. According to the findings of this section, the key component of promoting social capital is social relations in the form of social groups with purposeful joint activities. Then, the necessary samples for examination are identified and selected in four steps from among the neighborhoods of Tehran. In the continuation of the research method section, evaluation, and measurement of the level of social capital in selected samples were done. Evaluation of social capital was done by examining the composition of group social relations in the selected sample stations by counting group relations. It should be noted that the selected stations are selected by stratified random sampling. Finally, the analysis of the qualities of the physical space is carried out by the method of field perception and the evaluation of how these variables are related by the method of logical inductive reasoning which creates the final model of the research, and based on this model, the creation of public spaces with a small scale in the neighborhood space can be achieved. Both pedestrian axes and stopping places (independent variable), these spaces, while emphasizing the presence of residents (mediator variable) instead of temporary transit, lead to the promotion of local social capital (dependent variable); meanwhile, the qualities of these public areas are discussed in the final model.
Full-Text [PDF 3080 kb]   (319 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Case study | Subject: Identifying the way of life based on the three components of the body, lifestyle and concepts - meanings
Received: 2022/12/31 | Accepted: 2023/02/19 | ePublished: 2023/02/27

References
1. Brueckner, J. K., & Largey, A. G. 2008. Social interaction and urban sprawl. Journal of Urban Economics. 64(1): 18-34. [DOI:10.1016/j.jue.2007.08.002]
2. Chen, Long. 2018. The Relationship between Urban Form and Urban Sustainability: Empirical Evidence from Florida. Doctor of Philosophy, Florida State University Libraries.
3. Field, John. 2006. Social capital, translated by Gholamreza Ghafari and Hossein Ramezani, Tehran, Kavir [In Persian]
4. Gehl, Svarre, Jan, Birgitte. 2016. How to study everyone's life. Translated by Mustafa Behzadfar et al. Tehran: Elme Farda [In Persian]
5. Hanibuchi, T. & Kondo, K. & Nakaya, T. & Shirai, K. & Hirai, H., & Kawachi, I. 2012. Does walkable mean sociable? Neighborhood determinants of social capital among older adults in Japan. Health & Place. 18(2): 229-239. [DOI:10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.09.015]
6. Jacobs, Jane. 2018. Death and life of big American cities. Translated by Hamidreza Parsi. Arezoo Platoni. Tehran: University of Tehran [In Persian]
7. Khoshdel, Fatemeh. 2016. Investigating the spatial differences of social capital between the old and new cities of Lar. PhD Thesis. Faculty of Geography and Environmental Sciences. Hakim Sabzevari University [In Persian]
8. Khyberi, Samaneh & Pourjafar, Mohammad Reza & Izadi, Mohammad Saeed .2022. Place attachment at the neighborhood scale: a systematic review of two decades of scientific articles in Iran. Armanshahr Architecture and Urbanism Journal. 14 (34): 193-205 [In Persian]
9. Leyden, K. M. 2003. Social capital and built environment: The importance of walkable neighborhoods. American Journal of public health. September. 93(9): 1546-1551. [DOI:10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1546]
10. Lund, H. 2003. Testing the claims of new urbanism: Local access, pedestrian travel and neighboring behaviors. Journal of the American Planning Association. 69(4): 414-429. [DOI:10.1080/01944360308976328]
11. Piran, Parviz. 2012. Conceptual and theoretical foundations of social capital. Tehran: Elm [In Persian]
12. Qadri, Salahuddin. 2017. The structure of social stratification and socio-cultural clustering of neighborhoods in Tehran. Social studies and research in Iran. 7 (4): 761-731 [In Persian]
13. Rafipour, Farmarz. 2015. Anatomy of Society. Tehran: Publishing Company [In Persian]
14. Safaipour, Massoud & Alizadeh, Hadi & Daman Bagh, Safiya. 2014. Analysis of social capital components in Ameri neighborhood of Ahvaz city. Journal of Geography and Environmental Planning. 1:20-4 [In Persian]
15. Sediq Sarostani, Morteza. 2004. Designs of water spaces in Iranian architecture. Tehran: Honar Abi [In Persian]
16. Shekibai Bidroni, Fatemeh & Tabibian, Manouchehr. 2016. Evaluation of mutual effects of physical structure of urban neighborhoods on presence and social interactions in public spaces (case study of Qazvin), Armanshahr Architecture and Urbanization Journal.23: 306-295 [In Persian]
17. Sultanzadeh, Mohammad. 2016. The concept of social capital in the architecture of residential complexes of Islamic societies. PhD thesis. Tabriz Islamic Art University [In Persian]
18. Wood, A. & Giles-Corti, B. & Bulsara, M. 2012. Does Social Capital Vary with Neighborhood Design? Urban Studies Research. 2012: 1-11. [DOI:10.1155/2012/507503]
19. Won, Jaewoong & Lee, and Jae-Su. 2020. Impact of residential environments on social capital and health outcomes among public rental housing residents in Seoul. South Korea. Landscape and Urban Planning. 203: 1-11. [DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103882]

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Culture of Islamic Architecture and Urbanism Journal

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb