----------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------
year 5, Issue 2 (Semi-Annual 2020)                   CIAUJ 2020, 5(2): 75-90 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Soltanzadeh Zarandi M. An Investigation into the Relationship Between Social Capital and Built Environment of Residential Neighborhoods with an Emphasis on Public and Open Spaces: A Case Study of Tabriz. CIAUJ. 2020; 5 (2) :75-90
URL: http://ciauj-tabriziau.ir/article-1-236-en.html
Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman , msoltan@uk.ac.ir
Abstract:   (5125 Views)
Residential neighborhoods face challenges and anomalies in terms of their social aspect and the research upon various fields is aimed to find solutions to reduce or deal with them. Architectural and urban designers attempt to contribute to the promotion of social environment in neighborhoods and provide patterns, recommendations or policies in the scope of residence with regard to the concepts suggested in sociology, psychology and so on. Social capital is one of the referable concepts which has been proposed in recent decades. Social capital considers the resources available in the relationships of the individuals and groups and regards the resources as a capital for advancing the individual and collective goals. In the present century, it has been proposed as an option to confront the social challenges of human settlements in the form of communities and neighborhoods. The concepts such as social capital, help designers to obtain a clearer picture of what is happening in communities and neighborhoods and to provide the physical solutions. This research seeks to explore the relationship between the built environment of residential communities (focusing on open and public spaces) and the social capital and to find components or criteria of the built environment associated with the social capital. Due to the diversity and multiplicity existing in the definition of the concept, this study introduces a certain framework and determines five components including the trust, reciprocity, place attachment, local participation, and neighborhood ties to evaluate this concept. It also describes some components for assessing the built environment in two aspects of physical structure of community and physical components, and develops the research model. This model is tested in two case studies in Tabriz, Iran, which are physically different. To achieve the goal, this study employs a combination of data (triangulation method) derived from survey, observations and objective structure of samples and states that the built environment has a definite but minor effect on the social capital of inhabitants.The results showed that although the physical criteria of the two communities are different, especially in terms of the components contributing to the social capital as considered in the previous research, the level of social capital of the residents in the two samples and their assessment of the residential environment are close to each other. As the research suggests, it cannot be expected that the change in the built environment creates a balanced change in the behavior patterns of the residents. Beyond this general and remarkable result, the analyses showed that all the physical components affecting the social capital reviewed in the West do not appear to be true in the context of Iran. Also, among the physical criteria, the open space surface and the sidewalk surface are more strongly correlated with the social capital than the density. The most effective action for influencing the social capital through the change or modification of the physical structure is to predict the public green space (local parks), and among the influential components, the attractiveness of open and public spaces has the strongest relationship with the social capital of the residents. In general, this research states that it is necessary for refining, designing or improving the built environment of residential communities to avoid the direct referral to the Western studies and the mere reliance on their results and to involve the (social) considerations of the context of Iran. However, this requires extensive research to gain a proper understanding of the relationship between the social and built environment of the communities in the current Iranian society.
Full-Text [PDF 2225 kb]   (620 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: Identifying the way of life based on the three components of the body, lifestyle and concepts - meanings
Received: 2020/01/3 | Accepted: 2020/05/4 | ePublished: 2021/02/16

1. Adler, Paul.S. Kwon, Seok-Woo. 2002. Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept. Academy of Management Review. 27(1): 17-40. [DOI:10.5465/amr.2002.5922314]
2. Barton, H. Grant, M. and Guise, R. 2003. Shaping Neighborhoods: A Guide for Health, Sustainability and Vitality. London and New York: Spon Press.
3. Bourdieu, P. 1985. The forms of capital. In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. ed. J.G. Richardson, 241-258, New York: Greenwood.
4. Cabrera, J.F. 2013. New Urbanism and Selection Bias in the Formation of Social Capital. Housing Policy Debate. 23(2):376-394. [DOI:10.1080/10511482.2013.766626]
5. Carmona, M. T. Heath, S. and Tiesdell, Oc. 2003. Public Places, Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design. Translate by Fariba Gharaei, Zahra Ahari, Mahshid Shokouhi, Esmaeil Salehi. 2012. Tehran: Art University of Tehran. [in Persian] [DOI:10.4324/9780080515427]
6. Cattell, V. 2001. Poor People, Poor Places and Poor Health: The Mediating Role of Social Networks and Social Capital. Social Science & Medicine. 52:1501-16. [DOI:10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00259-8]
7. Coleman, James. 2006. Foundations of Social Theory. Translated by Manouchehr Saboori. 2007. Tehran, Nei. [in Persian]
8. Crnic, M. 2012. Social Capital and Neighbourhood Centers in Queensland: Qualitative Case Studies of Three Neighbourhood Centers. PhD diss. Queensland University of Technology.
9. Field, John. 2006. Social Capital. Translated by Gholamreza Ghaffari, Hosein Ramazani. 2007. Tehran: Kavir. [in Persian]
10. Firouzabadi, S.A. 2006. The factors affecting the formation of social capital in Tehran, PhD diss. Tehran University. [in Persian]
11. Forrest, R. Kearns, A, 2001. Social Cohesion, Social Capital and the Neighbourhood. Urban Studies. 38(12): 2125-2143 [DOI:10.1080/00420980120087081]
12. Francis, J. Corti, B. Wood, L. Knuiman, A. 2012. Creating Sense of Community: The Role of Public Space, Journal of Environmental Psychology. 32: 401-409 [DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.07.002]
13. French, S. Wood, L. Foster, S.A. Giles-Corti, B. Frank, L. Learnihan, V. 2014. Sense of Community and Its Association with The Neighborhood Built Environment. Environment Behavior. 46(6): 677-697. [DOI:10.1177/0013916512469098]
14. Fukuyama, F. 1997. The End of the Order‬. Translated by Gholamreza, Tavasolli. 2007. Tehran, Hekayat ghalam novin. [in Persian]
15. Fulkerson, G.M and Thompson, G.H. 2008. The Evolution of a Contested Concept: A Meta-Analysis of Social Capital Definitions and Trends, Sociological Inquiry, 78(4):536-557 [DOI:10.1111/j.1475-682X.2008.00260.x]
16. Gehl, J. 1987. Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space. Translated by shima shastchi. 2013. Tehran: Tehran University. [in Persian]
17. Gehl, J and Svarre, B. 2013. How to Study Public Life, Translated by Karen A. Steenhard. 2014. Washington: Island Press. [DOI:10.5822/978-1-61091-525-0]
18. Grootaert, C. Bastelaer, T.V. 2002. Understanding and Measuring Social Capital: A Multidisciplinary Tool for Practitioners, Washington D.C.: World Bank. [DOI:10.1596/0-8213-5068-4]
19. Holtan, M. T. Dieterlen, S.L. and Sullivan, W.C. 2014. Social Life Under Cover: Tree Canopy and Social Capital in Baltimore, Maryland. Environment & Behavior. 46(6): 1-24
20. Jacobs, Jane. 1992. The Death and Life of Great American Cities, Translated by Hamidreza Parsi and Arezoo Aflatooni.2013. Tehran: Tehran University. [in Persian]
21. Kang, B, (2006.. Effect of Open Spaces on The Interpersonal Level of Resident Social Capital: A Comparative Case Study of Urban Neighbourhoods in Guangzhou. PhD diss. A&M University.
22. Kaplan, S. 1983. A Model of Person-Environment Compatibility. Environment and Behavior. 15:311-332. [DOI:10.1177/0013916583153003]
23. Kazmierczak, A. 2013. The Contribution of Local Parks to Neighborhood Social Ties. Landscape and Urban Planning. 109(1): 31-44. [DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.05.007]
24. Koohsari, M.J. Karakiewicz, J.A. Kaczynski, A.T. 2012. Public Open Space and Walking: The Role of Proximity, Perceptual Qualities of the Surrounding Built Environment, and Street Configuration. Environment and Behavior. 45(6): 706-736. [DOI:10.1177/0013916512440876]
25. Koohsari, M. J. Mavoa, S. Villanueva, k. Sugiyama, T. Badland, H. kaczynski, A.T. Giles-Corti, B. 2015. Public Open Space, Physical Activity, Urban Design and Public Health: Concepts, Methods and Research Agenda. Health & Place. 33: 75-82. [DOI:10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.02.009]
26. Leyden, K. M. 2003. Social capital and built environment: The Important of Walkable Neighborhoods. American Journal of Public Health. 9: 1546-51 [DOI:10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1546]
27. Lin, N. 2001. Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511815447]
28. Moore, G.T. 2006. Environment, Behaviour and Society: A Brief Look at the Field and Some Current EBS Research at the University of Sydney. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of the Environment-Behaviour Research Association. China. May.
29. Perkins, D.D. and Long, D.A. 2002. Neighborhood Sense of Community and Social Capital: A Multi-level Analysis. In Psychological Sense of Community: Research, applications, and implications. ed. A. Fisher, C. Sonn, and B. Bishop, 291-318. New York: Plenum. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4615-0719-2_15]
30. Pirbabaei, M.GH, Firouzabadi, A, Hojjat, I, Soltanzadeh, M. 2016. Religion and Social Capital Analysis of Social Capacities of the Islamic Society of Iran. Social Theories of Muslim. 6(1): 107-128. [in Persian]
31. Putnam, R. D. 1996. Who Killed Civic American? Prospect. 7(24): 66-72.
32. Semenza, J.A. March, T.L. 2009. An Urban Community-Based Intervention to Advance Social Interactions, Environment and Behavior. 41(1): 22-42. [DOI:10.1177/0013916507311136]
33. Subramanian, S.V. Lochner, K. A. Kawachi, I. 2003. Neighborhood Differences in Social Capital: A Compositional Artifact or a Contextual Construct? Health & Place. 9: 33-44. [DOI:10.1016/S1353-8292(02)00028-X]
34. Rogers, S. H., Halstead, J. M., Gardner, K. H. and Carlson, C. H. 2010. Examining Walkability and Social Capital as Indicators of Quality of Life at The Municipal and Neighborhood scales. Applied Research Quality of Life. 6(2): 201-213. [DOI:10.1007/s11482-010-9132-4]
35. Uphoff, N. 2000. Understanding Social Capital: Learning from the Analysis and Experience of Participation. In Social Capital: A Multifaceted Perspective. ed. Partha Dasgupta and Ismail Serageldin. 215-249. Washington D.C.: World Bank.
36. Vemuri, A.W. Grove, G.M. Wilson, M.A. Burch, W.R. 2011. A Tale of Two Scales: Evaluating the Relationship Among Life Satisfaction, Social Capital, Income, and the Natural Environment at Individual and Neighborhood Levels in Metropolitan Baltimore. Environment and Behavior. 43(1): 3-25. [DOI:10.1177/0013916509338551]
37. Weller, S. Bruegel, L. 2009. Children's 'Place' in the Development of Neighbourhood Social Capital. Urban Study. 46(3): 629-643. [DOI:10.1177/0042098008100998]
38. Wood, L. 2006. Social Capital, Neighbourhood Environment and Health: development of measurement tools and exploration of links through qualitative and quantitative research. PhD diss. University of Western Australia.
39. Wood, A. Giles-Corti, B. 2008. Is There a Place for Social Capital in The Psychology of Health and Place?. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 28:154-163. [DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.11.003]
40. Wood, L. Shannon, T. Bulsara, M. Pikora, T. McCormack, G. Giles-Corti, B. 2008. The anatomy of the safe and social suburb: An exploratory study of the built environment, social capital and residents' perceptions of safety. Health & Place. 14: 15-31. [DOI:10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.04.004]
41. Wood, A. Giles-Corti, B. Bulsara, M. 2012. Does Social Capital Vary with Neighbourhood Design. Urban Studies Research. 2012: 1-11. [DOI:10.1155/2012/507503]

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2022 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Culture of Islamic Architecture and Urbanism Journal

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb