Volume 9, Issue 1 (Semi-Annual 2024)
CIAUJ 2024, 9(1): 17-44 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Zareihajiabadi F, Hamzenejad M, Memarian G. Adaptation of Heritage Buildings;a Concept Analysis. CIAUJ 2024; 9 (1) :17-44
URL: http://ciauj-tabriziau.ir/article-1-539-en.html
URL: http://ciauj-tabriziau.ir/article-1-539-en.html
1- Department of Architecture, School of Architecture and Urban planning, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Architecture, School of Architecture and Urban planning, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran ,hamzenejad@iust.ac.ir
2- Department of Architecture, School of Architecture and Urban planning, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran ,
Abstract: (959 Views)
Adaptation in heritage building encompasses a range of interventions and activities that improve existing building conditions to extend their lifespan. To address different aspects of heritage buildings adaptation, various terminologies are used in the literature and practice, including refurbishment, retrofitting, rehabilitation, renovation, restoration and adaptive reuse. These terminologies are often used in a synonymous and sometimes incorrectly. We have conducted a concept analysis to clarify the main terms addressing the adaptation interventions in heritage buildings. We developed a framework of related terminologies and classified them into four groups including paradigms, levels of intervention, adaptation plans, and strategies. We also review the application of these terminologies in the research articles and illustrate the differences between the concepts and their applications.
Type of Study: Review |
Subject:
Conceptualization of theorizing in Islamic architecture and urban ism
Received: 2024/01/20 | Accepted: 2024/05/28 | ePublished: 2024/06/29
Received: 2024/01/20 | Accepted: 2024/05/28 | ePublished: 2024/06/29
References
1. Abbaszadeh, M., Mohammadmoradi, A., Amirkabirian, A., Ayashm, M., & Soltanahmadi, E. (2019). Providing value-based model for application of architectural heritage value in adopting conservation practices Case Study: Takht-e Soleiman World Heritage Collection. Journal of Conservation and Architecture in Iran, 8(16), 125-142. [In Persian]
2. Abouei, R., Rahimi, H, & Parsaei, A. R. (2017). Recognition of Current Deficiencies in the Seismic Rehabilitation Procedure of Historical Buildings. Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 14(48), 57-68. [In Persian]
3. Alhojaly, R. A., Alawad, A. A., & Ghabra, N. A. (2022). A Proposed Model of Assessing the Adaptive Reuse of Heritage Buildings in Historic Jeddah. Buildings, 12(406). [DOI:10.3390/buildings12040406]
4. Ashworth, G. (2011). Preservation, Conservation and Heritage: Approaches to the Past in the Present through the Built Environment. Asian Anthropology, 10(1), 1-18.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1683478X.2011.10552601 [DOI:10.1080/1683478x.2011.10552601]
5. Ayatollahzade shirazi, B. (2003). The conservation of heritage buildings. Haftshahr, 1(11), 6-13. [In Persian]
6. Baarveld, M., Smit, M., & Dewulf, G. (2017). Implementing joint ambitions for redevelopment involving cultural heritage: a comparative case study of cooperation strategies. International Planning Studies, 23(1), 101-117. [DOI:10.1080/13563475.2017.1345300]
7. Baker, H. E. (2019). The adaptation and demolition of existing buildings on masterplan sites. University of Cambridge.
8. Bonyadi, N. (2012). Urban Conservation: Terminology and Approaches. Soffeh, 21(4), 125-140. https://soffeh.sbu.ac.ir/article_100370.html
9. Bosone, M., Toro, P. De, Girard, L. F., Gravagnuolo, A., & Iodice, S. (2021). Indicators for Ex-Post Evaluation of Cultural Heritage Adaptive Reuse Impacts in the Perspective of the Circular Economy. Sustainability, 13, 1-29. [DOI:10.3390/su13094759]
10. Bottero, M., D'Alpaos, C., & Oppio, A. (2019). Ranking of adaptive reuse strategies for abandoned industrial heritage in vulnerable contexts: A multiple criteria decision aiding approach. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(3), 1-18. [DOI:10.3390/su11030785]
11. Brand, S. (1994). How Buildings Learn, What Happens After They're Built. Penguin.
12. Brooker, G., & Stone, S. (2019). Rereading 2-Interior Architecture and the Principles of Remodelling Existing Buildings. RIBA Publishing. [DOI:10.5840/intstudphil199830277]
13. Che Husin, S. M., Mohd Zaki, N. I., & Abu Husain, M. K. (2019). Implementing sustainability in existing building through retrofitting measures. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 10(1), 1450-1471.
14. Chen, C., Chiu, Y., & Tsai, L. (2018). Evaluating the adaptive reuse of historic buildings through multicriteria decision-making. Habitat International, 81(May 2016), 12-23. [DOI:10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.09.003]
15. Della Spina, L. Della. (2020). Adaptive Sustainable Reuse for Cultural Heritage : A Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding Approach Supporting Urban Development Processes. Sustainability, 12, 1363. [DOI:10.3390/su12041363]
16. Douglas, J. (2006). Building Adaptation (2nd ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann. [DOI:10.4324/9780080458519]
17. Eftekhar, Z., Ekhtiari, M., & Taheri Shahraeini, M. (2019). Design process framework for reusing existing buildings Case Study: Old Wheat Silo of Shiraz. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba: Memary Va Shahrsazi, 24(2), 73-86. [In Persian] [DOI:10.22059/jfaup.2020.285324.672304]
18. Elsorady, D. A. (2014). Assessment of the compatibility of new uses for heritage buildings: The example of Alexandria National Museum, Alexandria, Egypt. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 15(5), 511-521. [DOI:10.1016/j.culher.2013.10.011]
19. EnglishHeritage. (2015). Conservation principles policies and guidance for the sustainable management of the historic environment. English Heritage. [DOI:10.1108/ss.2011.11029caa.019]
20. Fakhar Tehrani, F., Asgarian jedi, A., & Ghadiri, B. (1993). Rehabilitation, the Concession of New Life to Old Buildings. Soffeh, 3(4-3). [In Persian]
21. Falamaki, M. (2017). Urban improvement and renewal. The Center for Studying and Compling University Books in Humanitics (SAMT). [In Persian]
22. Fedorczak-Cisak, M., Kowalska-Koczwara, A., Filip Pachla, Radziszewska-Zielina, E., Szewczyk, B., 'Sladowski, G., & Tatara, T. (2020). Fuzzy Model for Selecting a Form of Use Alternative for a Historic Building to be Subjected to Adaptive Reuse. Energies, 13(2809). [DOI:10.3390/en13112809]
23. Gholami, G., Heidari, S., & Hanachi, P. (2021). Conservation and reuse of architectural heritage, an approach based on energy efficiency (Determining the process and describing the measures). Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba: Memary Va Shahrsazi, 26(1), 5-15. [In Persian] [DOI:10.22059/jfaup.2021.324136.672631]
24. Giebeler, G., Krause, H., Fisch, R., Musso, F., Lenz, B., & Rudolphi, A. (2009). Refurbishment Manual; Maintenance, Conversions, Extensions. IGI Global. [DOI:10.11129/detail.9783034614337]
25. Grecchi, M. (2022). Building Renovation; How to Retrofit and Reuse Existing Buildings to Save Energy and Respond to New Needs. Springer. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-89836-6]
26. Günçe, K., & Misirlisoy, D. (2019). Assessment of adaptive reuse practices through user experiences: Traditional houses in thewalled city of Nicosia. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(2). [DOI:10.3390/su11020540]
27. Habibi, S. mohsen, & Maghsoudi, M. (2010). Urban renovation. University of Tehran Press. [In Persian]
28. Haeri, M. (2018). Cultur of revitalization; Revival of culture. Journal of Revival of Historic Buildings and Fabrics, 3, 20-29. [In Persian]
29. Hanachi, P., & Shah-Teimouri, Y. (2022). Developing a Conceptual Framework for Adaptive Reuse in Conservation of Heritage Buildings. Journal of Iranian Architecture Studies, 10(19), 25-45. [In Persian] [DOI:10.22052/jias.2022.111863]
30. Havinga, L., Colenbrander, B., & Schellen, H. (2020). Heritage significance and the identification of attributes to preserve in a sustainable refurbishment. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 43, 282-293. [DOI:10.1016/j.culher.2019.08.011]
31. Heidari, S., Hanachi, P., & Teymoortash, S. (2019). The Adaptive Reuse of Industrial Heritage, an Approach Based on Energy Recycle. Mdrsjrns, 9(1), 45-53. [In Persian] http://bsnt.modares.ac.ir/article-2-27539-fa.html.
32. Icomos. (1964). The Venice Charter. ICOMOS.
33. Icomos. (1994). the Nara Document on Authenticity (1994) (p. 3). ICOMOS. https://www.icomos.org/charters/nara-e.pdf
34. Icomos. (2014). Burra Charter: The Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance (1999) (pp. 1078-1082). ICOMOS. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_1046]
35. Icomos & JPPI. (2003). Indonesian Charter for Heritage Conservation. ICOMOS.
36. Icomos Canada. (1983). Appleton Charter for the Protection and Enhancement of the Built Environment. ICOMOS.
37. Icomos China. (2015). Principles for the conservation of heritage sites in China. ICOMOS China.
38. Icomos New Zealand. (2010). ICOMOS New Zealand Charter for the Conservation of Places of Cultural Heritage Value (Issue v, pp. 1-11). ICOMOS New Zealand Charter. http://icomos.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/NZ_Charter.pdf
39. Janssen, J., Luiten, E., Renes, H., & Stegmeijer, E. (2017). Heritage as sector, factor and vector: conceptualizing the shifting relationship between heritage management and spatial planning. European Planning Studies, 25(9), 1654-1672. [DOI:10.1080/09654313.2017.1329410]
40. Lee Evans, N. (2019). An Introduction to Architectural Conservation. RIBA Publishing. [DOI:10.4324/9780429347542]
41. Lotfi, S, & M. Sholeh. (2017). Assessing the Old Buildings Reclaimability into the New Life Cycle Implementing Adaptive Reuse Potential (ARP) Model. Mdrsjrns, 7(3), 15-34. [In Persian]
42. Lotfi, Sahand, & Sholeh, M. (2020). Adaptive Reuse Gradient from ' Autocratic ' to ' Creative ': A Context-based Anthology of Adaptive Reuse Experience in Tehran ( 1970-2020 ) Adaptive Reuse Gradient from ' Autocratic ' to ' Creative ': A Context-based. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 00(00), 1-23. [DOI:10.1080/15583058.2020.1793428]
43. Mansfield, J. R. (2011). Sustainable refurbishment: Some practical regulatory hurdles. Structural Survey, 29(2), 120-132. [DOI:10.1108/02630801111132803]
44. Masoud, S. E., & Einifar, A. (2021). A Critical Investigation into Priorities in Adaptive Reuse Theories Within the Interior Architecture of Valuable Buildings. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Planning, 31(1), 1-11. [DOI:10.22068/ijaup.31.1.556]
45. Masoud, S., Eshrati, P., Faizi, M., & Einifar, A. (2019). Developing Theoretical Framework of Value in Interior Architecture Design of Heritage Buildings Case Study: Garden Museum of the Qasr Prison. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba: Memary Va Shahrsazi, 24(3), 97-110. [In Persian] [DOI:10.22059/jfaup.2019.272539.672192]
46. Miran, F. D., & Husein, H. A. (2023). Introducing a Conceptual Model for Assessing the Present State of Preservation in Heritage Buildings: Utilizing Building Adaptation as an Approach. Buildings, 13(4). [DOI:10.3390/buildings13040859]
47. Mohamed, R., Boyle, R., Yang, A. Y., & Tangari, J. (2017). Adaptive reuse: a review and analysis of its relationship to the 3 Es of sustainability. Facilities, 35(3-4), 138-154. [DOI:10.1108/F-12-2014-0108]
48. Mohammadmoradi, A. (2016). Rehabilitation of old city district. University of Tehran Press. [In Persian]
49. Nadkarni, R. R., & Puthuvayi, B. (2020). A comprehensive literature review of Multi-Criteria Decision Making methods in heritage buildings. Journal of Building Engineering, 32(August), 101814. [DOI:10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101814]
50. Nejadebrahimi, A., & Sharifi, A. (2019). Function and aproach in adaptive reuse. Ghazvin university. [In Persian]
51. Nuopponen, A. (2010a). Methods of concept analysis - a comparative study. LSP Journal, 1(1), 4-12.
52. Nuopponen, A. (2010b). Methods of concept analysis - Towards systematic concept analysis. LSP Journal, 1(2), 5-14.
53. Parkinson, A., Scott, M., & Redmond, D. (2016). Competing discourses of built heritage: Lay values in Irish conservation planning. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 22(3), 261-273. [DOI:10.1080/13527258.2015.1121404]
54. Patiwael, P. R., Groote, P., & Vanclay, F. (2019). Improving heritage impact assessment: an analytical critique of the ICOMOS guidelines. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 25(4), 333-347. [DOI:10.1080/13527258.2018.1477057]
55. Pieczka, M., & Wowrzeczka, B. (2021). Art in post-industrial facilities-strategies of adaptive reuse for art exhibition function in Poland. Buildings, 11(10). [DOI:10.3390/buildings11100487]
56. Plevoets, B., & Van Cleempoel, K. (2019). Adaptive Reuse of the Built Heritage Concepts and Cases of an Emerging Discipline. Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9781315161440]
57. Pourebrahimi, M., Eghbali, S. R., & Ghafori Fard, H. (2018). Assessment of Tehran Beasat Thermal Power Plant Reuse Potential, Based on Adaptive Reuse Potential (ARP) Model. Hoviatshahr, 12(2), 29-40. [In Persian]
58. Rodwell, D. (2007). Conservation and sustainability in historic cities. (Hanachi, P, Shah-Teimouri, Y.) University of Tehran Press. [In Persian]. [DOI:10.1002/9780470759547]
59. Shahi, S., Esnaashary Esfahani, M., Bachmann, C., & Haas, C. (2020). A definition framework for building adaptation projects. Sustainable Cities and Society, 63(March), 102345. [DOI:10.1016/j.scs.2020.102345]
60. Shasha, L. (2022). Adaptive reuse of the urban built environment and design intervention strategies. University of Pécs PTE.
61. Tahmasebi, A., & Nasekhian, S. (2020). Explanation to the Concept of Rehabilitation in Historic Buildings by Comparative Study of Different Functional Interventions. In richt-mbp (Vol. 4, Issue 13, pp. 207-223). [In Persian] [DOI:10.30699/PJAS.4.13.207]
62. Talebian (translator), M. (2008). Termonology. In J. Jokilehto (Ed.), A history of architectural conservation. Rozaneh. [In Persian]
63. The charter for revitalization & utilization of historic & cultural places. (2009). The fund for development of Handicrafts & handmade carpet & revitalization & utilization of historic & cultural Places. [In Persian]
64. Tootoonchi, R., & Fadaei Nezhad Bahramjerdi, S. (2021). Evaluation Criteria for Adaptive Reuse of Heritage Buildings to Assign Educational Use; Case Study: School of Conservation and Restoration. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 13(33), 41-55. [In Persian] [DOI:10.22034/aaud.2020.198337.1969]
65. Vilches, A., Garcia-Martinez, A., & Sanchez-Montañes, B. (2017). Life cycle assessment (LCA) of building refurbishment: A literature review. Energy and Buildings, 135, 286-301. [DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.11.042]
66. Weeks, K. D., & Grimmer, A. E. (2017). The secretary of the interior ' s standards for the treatment of historic properties with guidelines for preserving , rehabilitating , restoring & reconstructing historic. U.S. Department of the Interior.
67. Wong, L. (2016). Adaptive Reuse: Extending the Lives of Buildings. Birkhäuser. [DOI:10.1515/9783038213130]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
