----------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------
Volume 8, Issue 2 (Semi-Annual 2023)                   CIAUJ 2023, 8(2): 129-148 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mohammadhasani F, Shahbazi M, Sobouti H. Investigating the Position of Contemporary Mosques in the Urbanscape based on the Semiotics Approach. CIAUJ 2023; 8 (2) :129-148
URL: http://ciauj-tabriziau.ir/article-1-500-en.html
1- Department of Architecture, Zanjan branch, Islamic Azad University, Zanjan, Iran
2- Department of Architecture, Zanjan branch, Islamic Azad University, Zanjan, Iran , majidshahbazi57@gmail.com
Abstract:   (1183 Views)
Mosques in Islamic cities are one of the symbolic elements in the urban landscape that, while giving identity and meaning to the urban environment, make the city readable and oriented; But the changes and transformations created in the architectural structure and contemporary urban planning have altered the shape and image to the position of today's mosques. In this research, which was conducted in an analytical-comparative way, the authors investigate the role of contemporary mosques in the landscape of today's cities with the aim of improving the visual and semantic quality of urban landscapes. The statistical population of the research is 78 students of Architecture and Urban Planning of Azad University of Zanjan in the year 1400-1401. According to Cochran's formula, the statistical population is 65 randomly selected from the statistical population. The evaluations are based on the semiotic approach in the form of three dimensions "physical", "functional" and "meaning" with 16 criteria, through sample t-test and multivariate regression. Surveys show that, from the point of view of the statistical community, the level of realizability of contemporary mosques as a sign is at an average or even low level; So that the "physical" dimension with an average of 3.19 has more realizability compared to the functional dimension, 2.98 and the semantic dimension 2.74. Among the criteria, the criteria of "shape and form of building" with an average of 3.524 and the criterion of "place identity" with an average of 2.014 have the highest and lowest levels of realizability, respectively. The results of the research indicate that in the process of modernization of cities, mosques hold secondary importance as symbolic elements of identity building, and by losing their connection with the structure of the city and neighborhoods, their function has also changed.
Full-Text [PDF 3387 kb]   (391 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: the comparative studies of Architecture and Urbanism in the realm of Cultural Iran
Received: 2023/08/31 | Accepted: 2023/10/28 | ePublished: 2023/12/29

References
1. Abbasian Hamdani F, Daneshgar Moghadam, G. (2014). Investigating the sense of place in contemporary mosques with traditional and new design. Haft Hesar environmental studies. 3 (9): 13-22. [In Persian]
2. Ahmadi M, Farkisch H, Ahmadi V, Mirza Kouchak Khoshnevis A. (2020). An Insight into the Interrelation between the Mosques' Architectural Codes and the Quality of Worshipers' Presence of the Heart: A Case Study of the Safavid Mosques in Isfahan. CIAUJ; 5 (2):51-74. [In Persian] [DOI:10.29252/ciauj.5.2.51]
3. Appleyard D. (1970). Styles and Methods of Structuring a City. Environment and Behaviour,2, 100-116. [DOI:10.1177/001391657000200106]
4. Azizpour Shoubi A, Gharehbaglou M, Nejad Ebrahimi A; Keynejad M. (2022). Symbolism of Iranian Mosques Architecture with a Cultural Study Approach. Cultural Studies & Communication, 18(66): 125-149. [In Persian]
5. Bemanian M, Mohammadi S. (2014). A Study on the Role of Dome in the Design Patterns of Contemporary Mosques. Naqshejahan; 4 (3):7-16. [In Persian]
6. Chandler D. (2007). Semiot les: TheBasics، London، Rout Ledge.
7. Fakouhi N. (2000). Urban Anthropology. Tehran: Ney Publishing. [In Persian]
8. Habibi Lialestani M, Pourmand H, Naeemi M. (2022). Study on the Evolution of Designing approach of the Modern Mosques in the Second Pahlavi Era by Emphasis on the Critical Regionalist Approach (Case studies: Al-Javad Mosque, Tehran University Mosque, Jondi Shapour Mosque). mmi; 12 (30): 85-100. [In Persian]
9. Hamidi M. (1996). Skeletonization of the city of Tehran. (first volume). Tehran: Tehran Technical and Engineering Consultant Organization. [In Persian]
10. Hamzehnejad M, Amirabadi Farahani M. (2021). An Analysis of the Originality of Contemporary Mosques in the Islamic World. Naqshejahan; 10 (4): 305-316. [In Persian]
11. Hamzehnejad M, Arabi M. (2013). Investigation of Iranian Islamic authenticity in contemporary modern mosques, a case study: the design of Chaharrah Wali Asr Mosque (Aj) in Tehran. Iranian Islamic City Studies, 15: 47-61. [In Persian]
12. Hillenbrand R. (1998). Islamic Architecture: Form, Function, and Meaning (I. E'tesam, Trans). Tehran: Processing and Urban Planning Co.
13. Karimi N, Dadvar A. (2020). An Analysis on the Architectural Elements of the Imam Mosque of Isfahan based on the Semiotic Theory of Umberto Eco. Islamic Art Studies, 17(39): 336-352. [In Persian]
14. Kiani A, Arayesh Sh. (2013). Comparative study of the structure of traditional and modern mosques, a case study of Jame and Imam Semnan mosques and Al-Jawad Mosque (AS) in Tehran, the first national conference on civil engineering, architecture and sustainable development, Yazd. [In Persian]
15. Laripour N, Dadvar A. (2019). Semiotic analysis of form and meaning in Vakil mosque in Shiraz. Islamic Art Studies, 15(33):70-97. [In Persian]
16. Lynch K. (1960). The image of the city. Mass Cambridge Massachusetts: MIT press.
17. Mahdavi nejad M, Mashayekhi M, Bahrami M. (2015). Mosque design patterns in contemporary architecture. JRIA; 2 (4):1-15. [In Persian]
18. Mahdi Nejad J, Azemati H, Sadeghi Habib Abad A. (2020). Investigating the Structure of Traditional, Contemporary and Post-Islamic Revolution Mosques via the Method of Space Syntax (Case Study: Jameh Mosque of Isfahan, University of Tehran Mosque, Al-Ghadir Mosque, Shahrak-e Gharb Mosque). Mmi, 10 (22) :15-36. [In Persian] [DOI:10.52547/mmi.10.22.15]
19. Mahvash M, Moradpour R. (2017). Investigating Physical Image of an Ideal Mosque in the Subjective Assumptions of Society, Case Study: Bojnord City, North Khorasan Province. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 9(17): 139-149. [In Persian]
20. Mirsalami M, Omranipour A, Shareati S. (2023). Reading the Physical Structure of Mosques on How to Perceive, Behave and Measure Audience Attendance, Case Study: Traditional and Contemporary Mosques in Qazvin. JRIA, 11 (1):43-63. [In Persian] [DOI:10.52547/jria.11.1.2]
21. Mohammad Hassani E, Toghraei A, Mirgholami M. (2016). Legible Urban Landmarks: A Typological Approach (Case Study: Vali'asr Street in Tehran). Hoviat-e-shahr, 10(1):61-74. [In Persian]
22. Moradkhani A, Atighehchi N. (2019). Interpretation of semiology of the colour based on philosophical foundation Islamic Persian painting, Rahpooye Honar-Ha-Ye Tajassomi, 1(4): 5-21. [In Persian]
23. Nasr T. (2017). The Significance of Landmarks in Analysis of the Components of Identity and Culture in the Image of Iranian City (Case Study: Image of Shiraz City). Hoviat-e-shahr, 11(1): 17-28. [In Persian]
24. Nejad Ebrahimi A, Gharehbeiglu M, Vafaei, S.M. (2019). Effective factors on Communication and Semiotics in Architecture- case study: Kabood mosque in Tabriz. Javidan Kherad, 15(34):179-202. [In Persian]
25. Pakzad J. (2005). Cityscape: What Kevin Lynch understands, Abadi, 53: 20-25. [In Persian]
26. Pakzad J. (2008). Theoretical foundations and process of urban design. Tehran: Shahidi Publications. [In Persian]
27. Pour Ahmadi M. (2022). A Model for Classifying the Architectural Formal Approaches of Contemporary Mosques in Terms of Their Relationship with the Historical Traditions of Mosque Design. CIAUJ; 7 (2): 125-145. [In Persian] [DOI:10.52547/ciauj.7.2.125]
28. Pourjafar M, Amirkhani A, Lilian M. (2019). Architecture of modern and contemporary mosques in Asia, Europe, America, Africa and Oceania. First edition, Tehran: Tahan. [In Persian]
29. Rahimi Atani S, Bazrafakan K, Raeisi I. (2018). A New Method for Reading Architectural Texts Based on the Theory of Intertextuality (Case Study: Al-Qadir Mosque, Iran). CIAUJ ,4 (1) :53-67. [In Persian] [DOI:10.29252/ciauj.4.1.53]
30. Rapaport A. (1990). The Meaning of the Built Environment. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. 1990.
31. Rastegar Zhale S, Pedram B, Kiani M. (2020). Regeneration of the Ancient Narrative of Urban Landscape by Reproducing Sign-meanings in the Text Layers. mmi, 10 (24) :1-16. [In Persian] [DOI:10.52547/mmi.10.24.1]
32. Saussure F. (1983). Course in General Linguistics (French: Cours de linguistique générale), translated by Roy Harris, Open Court Publishing, Chicago.
33. Seyedian, S.A. (2008). Architecture (the case of Iran's architecture today and the issue of identity): reading identity in the culturalist approach to the revival of worn-out textures. Aine Khiyal, 2, (10): 69-77. [In Persian]
34. Shahabian S. (2018). Urban signs of connecting links of the city's readability, Hamshahri newspaper. https://newspaper.hamshahrionline.ir/
35. Shahroudi Kolour M, Taghipour M, Gerist F. (2020). The Comparative Evaluation of Sense of Place Components in Structural Elements of Shiraz Traditional and Contemporary Mosques the Case Study of Haji Ali Mosque, Moshir-ol-Molk Mosque, Al-Raja Mosque and Daneshgah Mosque. Architectural Thought, 4,8: 40-54. [In Persian]
36. Sojodi F. (2003). Applied Semiotics, Tehran: Nash Qesseh. [In Persian]
37. Whyte, W. (1980). Social Life of Small Urban Space: Conservation Foundation Using Spatial Monitoring. Urban Studies (30): 99-107.
38. Zah Tabchi H, Ghorbanifard M, Navai M. (2022). Investigation of Islamic symbols, signs and identity in Iranian architecture and urban planning, Restoration Researches, Iranian and Islamic Architecture, 5, (12): 39-47. [In Persian]
39. Zarei H, Asadpour A, momeni K. (2021). Examining the architectural and functional features of Nasir Al-Molk and Moshir Al-Molk Mosques in Shiraz. mmi ,11 (28) :1-18. [In Persian]
40. Zargar A, Nadimi H, Mokhtarshahi R. (2016). Mosque Architecture Guide, Tehran: DID Publication. [In Persian]

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Culture of Islamic Architecture and Urbanism Journal

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb