Volume 9, Issue 2 (Semi-Annual 2024)
CIAUJ 2024, 9(2): 183-206 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Faroughi M, Yazdani D. Comparison of Patterns and Developing Physical Criteria of Infill Design in Historical Context of City of Rasht Correspondence with Basic Concepts in Architecture. CIAUJ 2024; 9 (2) :183-206
URL: http://ciauj-tabriziau.ir/article-1-573-en.html
URL: http://ciauj-tabriziau.ir/article-1-573-en.html
1- Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Art, University of Guilan ,Rasht, Iran , faroughi@guilan.ac.ir
2- Department of Architecture, Faculty of Art and Architecture, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran
2- Department of Architecture, Faculty of Art and Architecture, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran
Abstract: (506 Views)
Iran's valuable structures and textures have long been relegated to mental oblivion and often left abandoned. The interaction between the "new" and the "old" under the guise of infill designs will be able to restore the continuity of physical form and function through new structures integrated with historical ones within the valuable old texture. The present research takes a step towards identifying appropriate design patterns on the scale of infill buildings in the ancient texture of City of Rasht and, in another step, seeks to establish essential physical and effective criteria in designing infill buildings along the current texture. Elucidating different types of infill models, the present research qualitatively used analytical and descriptive methods in its stages and juxtaposed the collected theoretical foundations with "basic concepts in architecture” in a creative manner to draw a comprehensive diagram of effective physical criteria and sub-criteria in infill designs. Additionally, it benefited from the opinions of experts familiar with the subject and investigated the most effective models using the Analytic Hierarchy Process and the most efficient and inefficient infill patterns using the TOPSISAlgorithm in city of Rasht. A diagram consisting of 4 main criteria, namely "form", "response to texture", "space," and "scale," along with 15 sub-criteria and 31 detailed criteria, which were effective in infill designs, was drawn according to the comparison of documents and theoretical foundations of infill designs with basic concepts in architecture. According to the expert survey, the "Integration" design model was considered the most effective design method in the texture of city of Rasht, and meeting the physical criteria of "response to texture" and "space" was the most effective infill criterion
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
the comparative studies of Architecture and Urbanism in the realm of Cultural Iran
Received: 2024/06/27 | Accepted: 2024/12/21 | ePublished: 2024/12/28
Received: 2024/06/27 | Accepted: 2024/12/21 | ePublished: 2024/12/28
References
1. Abdel Kader, Z.F. (2019). Infill design in heritage sites study of experts preferences and attitudes. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 66(4): 451-463.
2. Abdolhamidi M., Jalili Sadr Abad, M., & Dolat Abadi, F. (2019). Select the infill Architecture patterns, for historical Texture, with a focus on, physical-spatial features Case study: site of Qurkhaneh in Tehran. International Journal of Urban and Rural Management, 18(55): 255-276. [in Persian].
3. Adeli, S., & Nadimi, H. (2020). Conceptual Limits of Form in Architecture. BAGH-E NAZAR, 17(89): 55-70. [in Persian]
4. Alavi Zadeh, S., Islami, S., & Habib, F. (2018). Explanation of Fractal-Like Geometry in Context-Oriented Structure of Persian Bazaar. Islamic Art, 14(29): 28-58. [in Persian]
5. Alfirevic, D., & Alfirevic, S. (2015). Infill architecture: Design approaches for in-between buildings and bond as integrative elememnt. Arhitektura i Urbanizam, No.41: 24-39. [DOI:10.5937/a-u0-8293]
6. Anjom Shoae, M., Hanachi, P., & Andarodi, E. (2019). Principles and strategies for designing infill structures as driving development of historic fabrics. Journal of Studies on Iranian- Islamic City, 10(37): 67-81. [in Persian]
7. Azizi, Shadi., & Olanj, Safoura. (2017). Basic Concepts in Space Designing. Tehran: Fekr-e- No. [in Persian]
8. Bahramifar, P., Qobadian, V., & Mahmoudi, M. (2022). Recreating Concepts in the Architecture of Historical Bodies in the Construction of Interstate Buildings in the Historical Context of Metropolis Iran, Hoviatshahr, 4(16): 105-120. [in Persian].
9. Beigzadeh Shahraki, H., & Masoud, M. (2013). Infill buildings in historic context (Principles of design and evaluation). Tehran: Azarakhsh. [in Persian].
10. Beigzadeh Shahraki, H., & Masoud, M. (2014). Principles of infill buildings formation in historical urban fabrics, according to international declarations and charters. Urban Regional Studies and Research, 6(22), 85- 108. [in Persian]
11. Brolin, B.C. (2017). Architecture in context: pitting new buildings with old. Translated by Razieh Rezazadeh. Tehran: Khak Publications. [in Persian]
12. Collins, P. (2009). History of architectural theory: Transformation of ideals in modern architecture. Translated by Hosein Pour. Tehran: Qatreh Publications. [in Persian]
13. Dondis, D.A. (2017). A primer of visual literacy. Translated by Masoud Sepehr, Tehran: Soroush Publications. [in Persian]
14. Eisakhani, V., Bemanian, M., & Keshmiri, H. (2017). Creation of an Appropriate Function in Order to Improve Economic Performance and Prevent Exhaustion and Destruction in Cultural- Historical Buildings of Shiraz Historical Texture, Case Study: Pakyari Complex. Armanshahr Journal of Architecture & Urban Planning, 10(19): 143-152. [in Persian]
15. Gaber, M., & Akcay, A. (2020). Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation Techniques of New Infill Designs in Historic Context. AMAZONIA Investiga, 35(9): 20-33. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2020.35.11.2 [DOI:10.34069/AI/2020.35.11.2.]
16. Ghadiri, B., & Arasteh, Sh. (2006). New constructions in historic context. Tehran: Cultural Research Center. [in Persian]
17. Hanachi, P., & Shah Teimouri. (2021). Developing a Conceptual Framework for Adaptive Reuse in Conservation of Heritage Buildings. Journal of Iranian Architecture Studies, No. 19, 25-45. [in Persian]
18. Hanachi, P., Fadaei Nezhad. (2011). A Conceptual Framework for Integrated Conservation and Regeneration in Historic Urban Areas. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture and Urban Planning, 10(16): 25-45. [in Persian]
19. Hedmann, R., & Jaszewski, A. (2006). Fundamentals of urban design. Translated by Razieh Rezazadeh & Mostafa Abbaszadegan, Tehran: Iran University of Science and Technology Publications. [in Persian]
20. Hu, Y., Heath, T., Tang, Y., & Zhang, Q. (2017). Using quantitative analysis to assess the appropriateness of infill building in historic settings. Journal of Architectural and planning Research, 34(2): 91-113.
21. Karimimoshaver, M., & Winkemann, P. (2018). A framework for assessing tall buildings' impact on the city skyline: aesthetic, visibility and meaning dimensions. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, (73): 164-176. [DOI:10.1016/j.eiar.2018.08.007]
22. Letzter, J. (2022). Additions to historic buildings: between parasite and prosthetic architecture. Journal of Architectural Conservation,
https://doi.org/10.1080/13556207.2022.2095803 [DOI:10.1080/13556207.2022.2095803.]
23. Majedi, H., Zebardast, E., & Saghafi Asl, A. (2014). Application of TOPSIS technique in ranking of Tehran urban design projects with implementation evaluation approach. Honarhaye Ziba- Honarhaye Memari va Shahrsazi, 4(18): 69-78. [in Persian]
24. Manochehri, B., & Shieh, E. (2013). Grading the Socio-economic Development Rate of the North Khorasan Province with the Use of TOPSIS Model. Urban Management Studies, 5(15): 73-84. [in Persian]
25. Mason, M. (2010). Sample Size and saturation in Phd studies using qualitative interviews. http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1428/3027.
26. Masoud, M., & Beigzadeh Shahraki, H. (2012). Maintaining and regeneration motifs of urban space. Research and Urban Planning, 3(10): 43-66. [in Persian]
27. Mirzaie, Kh. (2017). Qualitative researching: research, researching writing. Tehran: Fouzhan Publications. [in Persian]
28. Misirlisoy, D. (2016). Contemporary extensions and heritage buildings; A design methodology. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing. 97-185.
29. Naghavi, P., & Mazaherian, H. (2019). Analysis of Contemporary Theories When Encountering the Context in Architectural Design. BAGH-E-NAZAR, 16(74): 69-80. [in Persian]
30. Nourani Yazdi, M. (2018). An introduction to understanding the concept of symmetry and balance in architecture. Memarishenasi, 1(2), 1-7. [in Persian] [DOI:10.4324/9780429505348-1]
31. Niaei, E., Daneshjoo, Kh., & Bemanian, M. (2021). Analysis of the Physical Criteria of Infill Buildings to be used in Design and Evaluation. BAGH-E-NAZAR, 18(100): 41-58. [in Persian]
32. Orbasli, A. (2008). Architectural Conservation: Principles and Practice, Blackwell Science.
33. Rodwell, D. (2007). Conservation and Sustainability in Historic Cities. Blackwell Publishing. [DOI:10.1002/9780470759547]
34. Saghafi Asl, A., Zebardast, E., & Majedi, H. (2014). Application of TOPSIS Technique in Ranking of Tehran Urban Design Projects with Implementation Evaluation Approach. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture and Urban Planning, 18(4): 69-78. [in Persian]
35. Sayyad, A, Gharibpour, A,. & Delashad Siahkali, M. (2019). Spaciousness and body awareness: rereading the concept of space in architectural experience Case study: Tehran Museum of Contemporary Art. BAGH-E NAZAR, 16(75), 71-82. [in Persian]
36. Serra, J., Inarra, S., Torres, A., & Lopis, Jorge. (2021). Analysis of façade solutions as an alternative to demolition for architectures with visual impact in historical urban scenes. Journal of Cultural Heritage, (52): 84-92. [DOI:10.1016/j.culher.2021.09.005]
37. Serra, J., Linares, C., Torres, A., & Lopis, J. (2020). Improvement of the integration of visually architectures in historical urban scene, an application of semantic differential method. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, (81): 1-12. Shahabi nejad, A,. Aboie, R., Ghalenoei, M., & Mazafar, F. (2015). Human scale in Naghshe- Jahan square. Maremat & Me'mari- e Iran, 4(8): 1-18. [in Persian]
38. Shah Teimori, Y., Mazaherian, H. (2012). Design Guidelines for New Constructions in Historic Context. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture and Urban Planning, 17(4): 29-40. [in Persian]
39. Scott, F. (2018). On Altering Architecture. Translated by Alireza Einifar, Ehsan Masoud & Navid Golchin, Tehran: Fekr e No. [in Persian]
40. Zakerhaghighi, K., Majedi, H., & Habib, F. (2010). Identifying Effective Indicators for Typology of Urban Fabrics. Hoviatshahr, 4(7): 105-112. [in Persian]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
