Volume 10, Issue 1 (Semi-Annual 2025)
CIAUJ 2025, 10(1): 169-195 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Aslani P, Habib F, Shahcheraghi A. Meta-synthesis of Bio-Aesthetic Components and Criteria in Residential Environments. CIAUJ 2025; 10 (1) :169-195
URL: http://ciauj-tabriziau.ir/article-1-599-en.html
URL: http://ciauj-tabriziau.ir/article-1-599-en.html
1- Department of Architecture, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Urban Planning, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran ,f.habib@srbiau.ac.ir
2- Department of Urban Planning, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran ,
Abstract: (1052 Views)
In recent decades, studies on residential environments and the crisis in architectural and urban planning structures in Iran have become a topic of discussion among experts. Previous studies show that, on one hand, aesthetic values are one of the influential factors in the quality of residential environments, and on the other hand, reviewing the existing research and related sources highlights the lack of clear and defined components and criteria in explaining bio-aesthetics. The aim of the present research is to identify the components and criteria of bio-aesthetics in residential environments. This objective is achievable by extracting the aforementioned criteria from the existing research in the field of architectural aesthetics. In this regard, the type of research is applied, and the methodological approach is qualitative. Additionally, the strategy adopted is the meta-synthesis method developed by Sandelowski and Barroso. The data collection tool consists of the previous research studies. In this context, from the 623 articles identified during the systematic literature review of the past four decades in electronic databases, 77 selected articles and books met the selection criteria. Furthermore, to determine the content validity of the research, the internal validity of the components and criteria was assessed using the Lawshe Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and a survey of 15 experts. The results, after identification, coding, and categorization, have been presented in the form of a conceptual model of bio-aesthetics. The findings indicate that the bio-aesthetic component can be analyzed based on four aspects: perceptual aesthetics, cognitive aesthetics, social aesthetics, and biological (bio) aesthetics, with thirteen criteria and forty-eight sub-criteria identified and analyzed.
Keywords: Bio-aesthetics, residential environments, meta synthesis, Lawshe Content Validity Ratio (CVR)
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
Identifying the way of life based on the three components of the body, lifestyle and concepts - meanings
Received: 2024/12/20 | Accepted: 2025/04/19 | ePublished: 2025/06/30
Received: 2024/12/20 | Accepted: 2025/04/19 | ePublished: 2025/06/30
References
1. Aatty, H.M., & Slik, G.A. (2019). Iconic architecture and sustainability as a tool to attract the global attention. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. [DOI:10.1088/1757-899X/518/2/022076]
2. Abed, A., Al-Jokhadar, A. (2022). Common space as a tool for social sustainability. J Hous and the Built Environ 37, 399-421. [DOI:10.1007/s10901-021-09843-y]
3. Aboelata, M.J., Ersoylu, L., & Cohen, L. (2011). Community Engagement in Design and Planning. [DOI:10.5822/978-1-61091-036-1_19]
4. Amini, Sh., Ahmadzadeh, H., Hoshyar, H., & Valizadeh, R. (2021). Identifying future components of urban livability with a futures studies approach: The case of Mahabad city. Sustainable City Quarterly, 4(3), 99-113. [in Persian]
5. Appleyard, D. and M. Lintell (1972) "The environmental quality of city streets: the residents' viewpoint." J. of the American Institute of Planners 38: 84-101. [DOI:10.1080/01944367208977410]
6. Azemati, H. Jam, F. Ghorbani, M., Dehmer, M., Ebrahimpour. R. Ghanbaran, A. & Emmer-Streib, F. (2020). The Role of Symmetry in the Aesthetics of Residential Building Façades Using Cognitive Science Methods Symmetry, 12(9), 1438. [DOI:10.3390/sym12091438]
7. Baidrakhmanova, M., Aldungarova, A., & Kulisz, M. (2024). Methods Of Applying The Environmental Approach In Architectural Design In Modern Residential Complexes. Bulletin D. Serikbayev of EKTU. [DOI:10.51885/1561-4212_2024_1_70]
8. Bandari, A., & Jamshidi, O. (2021). Environmental attitude and strategies for its enhancement. Human and Environment, 19(1): 115-131. [in Persian]
9. Beatley, T. (2011). Biophilic cities: Integrating nature into urban design and planning. Island Press. [DOI:10.5822/978-1-59726-986-5]
10. Bhyan, P., Shrivastava, B. & Kumar, N. (2023). Systematic literature review of life cycle sustainability assessment system for residential buildings: using bibliometric analysis 2000-2020. Environ Dev Sustain 25, 13637-13665.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02636-5 [DOI:10.1007/s10668-022-02636-5.]
11. Bittermann, M.S. & Ciftcioglu, Ö. (2016). Visual perception with color for architectural aesthetics. Presented at the IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence - WCCI 2016, Vancouver, Canada, 2016. [DOI:10.1109/CEC.2016.7744285]
12. Borsi, K., Ekici, D., Hale, J., & Haynes, N. (Eds.). (2022). Housing and the City (1st ed.). Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9781003245216]
13. Carlson, A. (2006). Aesthetics and the environment. London: Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.1353/jae.2006.0030
https://doi.org/10.2307/4140209 [DOI:10.1093/aesthj/ayl024]
14. Carmona, M. (2021). Public Places, Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design (Faryba Gharaei & colleagues, Trans.). Tehran: University of Art Publishing. [in Persian] [DOI:10.4324/9781315158457]
15. Carp, F. M., Zawadski, R. T., & Shokrkon, H. (1976). Dimensions of Urban Environmental Quality. Environment and Behavior, 8(2), 239-264. [DOI:10.1177/001391657682004]
16. Cushing, D.F., & Miller, E. (2019). Creating Great Places: Evidence-based Urban Design for Health and Wellbeing. [DOI:10.4324/9780429289637]
17. Dandis, D. A. (2004). Fundamentals of Visual Literacy (M. Sepehr, Trans.). Tehran: Soroush. [in Persian]
18. Davies, S., Higgins, K. M., Hopkins, R., Stecker, R., Cooper, D. E. (2009). A Companion to Aesthetics, Blackwell Publishing Ltd. [DOI:10.1002/9781444310436]
19. Dietrich, u. (2020). Human perception and aesthetic of facades in S. Hernández, P. Chias (Eds), Eco-Architecture VII: Harmonisation between Architecture and Nature (pp 71-87). Southampton, UK: WIT Press. [DOI:10.2495/ARC200061]
20. Ellard, C. (2015). Places of the Heart: The Psychogeography of Everyday Life. Bellevue Literary Press.
21. Estaji, H. (2017). A review of flexibility and adaptability in housing design. International Journal of Contemporary Architecture, 4(2), 37-49.
22. Estarabi Ashtiani, H Etesam, I. and Majedi, H. (2020). Cultural-Identity Policies of Architectural Projects with Emphasis on Ekbatan Town of Tehran. Islamic Art Studies, 16.17(38), 37-47. doi: 10.22034/ias.2020.211859.1114.
23. Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2000). Learning from museums: Visitor experiences and the making of meaning (pp. 45-65). AltaMira Press.
24. Garmsiri-Nejad, S., Khorram-Bakht, M., & Moghali, M. (2021). Evaluation of urban space quality based on gender perspective (Case study: Alishahr new city). Sociological Studies, 14(53), 129-143. [in Persian]
25. Ghomeshi, M., & Jusan, M. M. (2013). Investigating different aesthetic preferences between architects and non- architects in residential façade designs. Indoor and built environment, 22(6), 952- 964. [DOI:10.1177/1420326X12458513]
26. Ghometshi, M. (2021) Aesthetic preferences of laypersons and ats relationship with the conceptual properties on building façade design Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 20(1), 12-28. [DOI:10.1080/13467581.2020.1782209]
27. Gifford, R., Hine, D. W., Muller-Clemm, W., Reynolds JR, D. A. J., & Shaw, K. T. (2000). Decoding modern architecture: A lens model approach for understanding the aesthetic differences of architects and laypersons. Environment and Behavior, 32(2): 163-187. [DOI:10.1177/00139160021972487]
28. Gilderbloom, J.I., Hanka, M.J., & Ambrosius, J.D. (2009). Historic preservation's impact on job creation, property values, and environmental sustainability. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 2: 101 - 83. [DOI:10.1080/17549170903056821]
29. Gray, T., & Birrell, C. (2014). Are biophilic-designed site offices linked to improved work performance? Building and Environment, 82: 33-45.
30. Gröter, Jörg Kurt. (2022). Aesthetics in Architecture (trans. Jahan Shah Pakzad & Abdulreza Homayoun). 2nd ed. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University Press. [in Persian]
31. Grütter, P. K. (2004). Aesthetics in Architecture (Jahanshah Pakzad & Abdolreza Homayon, Trans.). Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University Press. [in Persian]
32. Guarini, M. R., Morano, P., & Sica, F. (2019). Integrated ecosystem design: An evaluation model to support the choice of eco-compatible technological solutions for residential building. Energies, 12(14), 2659. [DOI:10.3390/en12142659]
33. Habibi, A. (2016). Environmental aesthetics: The role of environmental beauty indicators in understanding the city's landscape. Manzar, 35: 55-50. [in Persian]
34. Hekkert, P. (2006). 'Design Aesthetics: Principles of Pleasure in Design' Psychology Sciences, Vol.48: pp. 157-172.
35. Hosseini-Nasab, S., Mahdizadeh Seraj, F., Khan Mohammadi, M., & Qomari, H. (2022). Exploring the aesthetic aspects of residential facades in Tehran from a neuro-architecture perspective. Manzar, 14(60), 18-29. [in Persian]
36. Hung, S. H., & Chang, C. Y. (2021). Health benefits of evidence-based biophilic-designed environments: A review. Journal of People, Plants, and Environment, 24(1), 1-16. [DOI:10.11628/ksppe.2021.24.1.1]
37. Ilbeigi, M., & Ghomeishi, M. (2017). An assessment of Aesthetics in Conceptual Properties and its Relation to Complexity among Architects and Non-Architects in Residential Façade Design in Iran. Journal of Buildings and Sustainability, 2.
38. Inam, A. (2024). The Role of Aesthetic Parameters in Shaping Emotional Attachment to Build Environments. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research.
39. Iveson, K. (2013). Cities within cities: Urban public spaces as arenas for citizenship. Social & Cultural Geography, 14(1), 1-22.
40. Joseph, O. O, Adeboye. A. B. Tizema. J. C. & Opaluwa, E. (2020) Shapes And Aesthetic Perception: A Case Study Of University Of Lagos Senate Building Façade. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 9(03), 5.
41. Joshi, R.P., Pathak, M., & Singh, A.K. (2014). Designing Self-Energy Sufficient Buildings in India. Energy Procedia, 57: 3110-3119. [DOI:10.1016/j.egypro.2015.06.062]
42. Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3): 169-182. [DOI:10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2]
43. Karimi Azari, A. R., & Safarnezhad, M. (2016). Identification of objective and subjective components affecting facade design to enhance urban landscape aesthetic identity and increase citizens' sense of belonging. Journal of Urban Landscape Research, 6: 89-106. [in Persian]
44. Kasravi, R. (2017). From aesthetics to the aesthetics of residential building facades in district 17 of Tehran municipality. Quarterly Journal of Art and Civilization of the East, 18, 14-17. [in Persian]
45. Kellert, S. R. (2015). Nature by design: The practice of biophilic design. yale university press.
46. Khaleghi, Z., Habib, F., & Zabihee, H. (2023). Formulation of water indicators and criteria in urban landscapes to enhance urban environmental quality. Journal of Applied Geographic Sciences, 23(71), 319-340. [in Persian] [DOI:10.61186/jgs.23.71.319]
47. Lang, J. (1988). Symbolic aesthetics in architecture: toward a research agenda. Environmental aesthetics: Theory, research, and applications: 11-26. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511571213.004]
48. Lang, J. (2015). The Creation of Architectural Theory: The Role of Behavioral Sciences in Environmental Design (Alireza Aini Far, Trans.). Tehran: University of Tehran Publishing Institute. [in Persian]
49. Lang, J.T. (1988). Environmental aesthetics: Symbolic aesthetics in architecture: toward a research agenda. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511571213.004]
50. Latif, S.A., Omar, M., Bidi, Y.H., & Awang, Z. (2016). Creating Pro-Environmental Residents: The role of environmental knowledge.
51. Lavie, T. & Tractinsky, N. (2012). 'Assessing Dimension of Perceived Visual Aesthetics of Web Sites' Human-Computer, Vol.60: pp. 269-298. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.09.002]
52. Leaman, Adrian $ Bordass, Bill. (2004), Flexibility and adaptability. Designing Better Buildings: Quality and Value in the Built Environment, p. 145, London.
53. Light, A., & Smith, J. (2022). The aesthetics of everyday life (S. Bahraini, Trans.) (2nd ed.). Tehran: Kargadan Publications. [in Persian]
54. Lukuman, M., Sipan, I., Raji, F., & Aderemi, O. S. (2017). Sustainable livable housing: A review of what traditional urban areas residents find important. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, 4(3). [DOI:10.11113/ijbes.v4.n3.212]
55. Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City (pp. 45-65). MIT Press.
56. Maayah, Ayman. (2023). Scientific background impact on aesthetic perception in residential environments. проект байкал. 174-185. [DOI:10.51461/issn.2309-3072/77.2213]
57. Mahapatra, S., & Vijayalatha, D.R. (2024). Assessing the Impact of Experiential Learning in Promoting Environmental Education and Sustainable Practices. International Journal of Emerging Knowledge Studies. [DOI:10.70333/ijeks-03-08-012]
58. Majedi, H., & Fahimi, A. (2011). Designing identity-based human settlements: A holistic approach to habitation. Iranian Architecture & Urbanism, 2(2): 83-90. [in Persian]
59. Mansouri, M. R. (2019). Urban livability: requirements and solutions. Geography and Human Relations, 2(3), 374-382. [in Persian]
60. Masoumi, A., & Ghalambar Dezfouli, M. (2020). Measuring the factors affecting aesthetic quality in urban housing (Case study: Jamalabad neighborhood). City Identity Journal, 14(42): 81-94. [in Persian]
61. Moatamedi Nejad, M., & Saeidi Mofrad, S. (2021). Evaluation of the impacts of visual aesthetics of building facades on the natural landscape. Environmental Science and Technology, 23: 51-68. [in Persian]
62. Mohammadi, M., & Rajabi Vajargah, S. (2020). Developing an optimal model of intercultural communication to enhance the lived experience of users in contemporary multicultural spaces (Case study: Si Tir Street, Tehran). Sustainable Architecture and Urban Planning, 8(1): 81-99. [in Persian]
63. Mousapour, B. (2023). Assessment of biophilic design's impact on citizens' residential satisfaction to enhance pro-environmental behavior. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 20(4): 761-775. [DOI:10.1080/17452007.2023.2209709]
64. Mousavi Sarvineh Baghi, E. S., & Sadeghi, A. (2016). Presenting a design process for urban façades to enhance visual and aesthetic qualities of the urban landscape: A case study of Ahmadabad Street, Mashhad. Urban Management, (43): 114-119. [in Persian]
65. Mousavi Sarvineh Baghi, E. S., & Sadeghi, A. (2016). Presenting the process of designing urban facades to enhance the visual quality of urban landscape aesthetics: Case study: Ahmadabad Street, Mashhad. Urban Management, 43: 114-119. [in Persian]
66. Mousavian, S., & Aminzadeh Goher Rizi, B. (2022). Defining the components of architectural aesthetics based on user experience (Case study: Iconic cultural buildings in Nehran city). Bagh Nazar Journal, 19(113): 45-62. [in Persian]
67. Nasar, J. L. (1994). Urban Design Aesthetics: The Evaluative Qualities of Building Exteriors. Environment and Behavior, 26(3): 377-401.
https://doi.org/10.1177/001391659402600305 [DOI:10.1177/001391659402600305.]
68. Neysi, A., Afifi, M. E., & Moghli, M. (2022). Environmental resilience assessment to enhance ecological connectivity (Case study: Ahvaz city). Geographical Sciences (Applied Geography), 18(40): 132-154. [in Persian]
69. Nguyen, L. P., van den Berg, P. E., Kemperman, A. D., & Mohammadi, M. (2024). Social impacts of living in high-rise apartment buildings: The effects of buildings and neighborhoods. Journal of Urban Affairs, 1-22.
https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2024.2311165 [DOI:10.1080/07352166.2024.2311165.]
70. Pakzad, J., Ghassami, M., Torkzad, N., & Torabi, M. (2014). Theoretical foundations and the urban design process. Tehran: Shahidi. [in Persian]
71. Parsons, G. (2010). Beauty and Public Policy, London: Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment.
72. Perlaviciute, G., & Steg, L. (2012). Quality of life in residential environments. PsyEcology, 3(3): 325-340. [DOI:10.1174/217119712802845732]
73. Plowright, P.D., & Adhya, A. (2022). Urban Design Made by Humans [DOI:10.4324/9781003254935]
74. Porter, J. D. (2020). Environmental aesthetics and landscape architecture (L. Aghadadashi & M. Sadeghi, Trans.). Tehran: Kalleh Publisher. [in Persian]
75. Pourjafar, M., & Alavi Balmani, M. (2012). Video ecology: Visual ecology in architecture and urban design. Tehran: Arman Shahr. [in Persian]
76. Priya, U.K., & Senthil, R. (2024). Framework for Enhancing Urban Living Through Sustainable Plant Selection in Residential Green Spaces. Urban Science. [DOI:10.3390/urbansci8040235]
77. Rafian, M., & Asgari Zadeh, Z. (2009). Investigating the factors affecting the decline in urban environmental quality. Urban Management Studies, 1(3): 111-126. [in Persian]
78. Ramzy, N.S. (2015). Biophilic qualities of historical architecture: In quest of the timeless terminologies of 'life' in architectural expression. Sustainable Cities and Society, 15: 42-56. [DOI:10.1016/j.scs.2014.11.006]
79. Rao, P. (2021). Role of Green Spaces for Maintaining Well-Being in Residential Community Development. IntechOpen. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.97681. [DOI:10.5772/intechopen.97681]
80. Rezai, M., Shabiri, S. M., Sarmadi, M. R., & Larijani, M. (2016). The impact of environmental programs on enhancing environmental literacy among students. Environmental Education and Sustainable Development, 4(4): 41-54. [in Persian]
81. Rian, I. M., & Sassone, M. (2012). Flexible housing, a healthy housing: a brief discussion about the merits of flexibility in designing healthy accommodation. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on'Inhabiting the Future', ABITARE, Napoli, Italy (pp. 1-6).
82. Saboonchi Lilabadi, M., Aminzadeh Gohar Rizi, B., & Shahcheraghi, A. (2020). The role of architectural design in improving the quality of life in residential complexes in new cities of Iran. Hafthesar Environmental Studies, 9(33): 157-171. [in Persian] [DOI:10.29252/hafthesar.9.33.157]
83. Safdarian, G., & Habib, F. (2014). Study of the Impact of Culture on Qualitative Structure of Residential Complexes in Tehran. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development, 4: 15-26.
84. Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. Springer.
85. Saqabi, M., Mafi, E., & Vatanparast, M. (2022). Evaluation and measurement of urban livability and its influencing factors: A case study of Bojnord city. Applied Research in Geographical Sciences (Geographical Sciences), 22(67): 335-350. [in Persian] [DOI:10.52547/jgs.22.67.335]
86. Saremi, H. R., & Baharvand Ahmadi, B. (2020). Aesthetics in architecture and urban planning. Tehran: Avval o Akhar Publications. ISBN: 978-622-0850-65-6. [in Persian]
87. Seftianingsih, D.K., Rafia, I., Rifai, D.M., & Paradita, D.S. (2024). Aesthetics Of Wayang Symbols On The Ceiling Of Graha Sahid Surakarta Building: Cultural Influence In Interior Design. Kawruh: Journal of Language Education, Literature and Local Culture.
88. Shahcheraghi, A. (2009). Analyzing the environmental perception process of the Iranian garden based on the theory of ecological psychology. City Identity, 3(5), 84-71. [in Persian]
89. Shahcheraghi, A., & Bandarabad, A. (2017). Surrounded by environment. 2nd edition. Tehran: Jihad University Press. [in Persian]
90. Shakeri, M. ., & Arjmand, A. (2019). Improving the quality of life in a residential complex by identifying the practical criteria of educational public spaces. Innovaciencia, 7(2), 1.13. [DOI:10.15649/2346075X.765]
91. Shbaita, A. S., Denerel, S. B., & Asilsoy, B. (2024). An Evidence-Based Assessment of Biophilic Interior Design in a Traditional Context: The Case of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Sustainability, 16(18), 7979.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su16187979 [DOI:10.3390/su16187979.]
92. Smith, P. F. (1976). A Psychological Model for Aesthetic Experience. Leonardo, 9(1): 25-31. [DOI:10.2307/1573295]
93. Sohrabian, G., & Habib, F. (2015). Explaining the aesthetic components of the night cityscape. Urban Management, 41: 187-204. [in Persian]
94. Stetsky, S.V., & Dorozhkina, E.I. (2021). Position of residential buildings in the urban tissue in relation to environmental affect: a review. E3S Web of Conferences. [DOI:10.1051/e3sconf/202124406006]
95. Tabatabai, M. (2011). Urban facades and their role in environmental quality (Criteria for facade design in urban spaces). Tehran: Arman Shahr. [in Persian]
96. Tatarcovich, A. (2002). Form in the history of aesthetics (K. Dustkhah, Trans.). Honar-e-Tabestan, 52. [in Persian]
97. Ter, L., & Isa, M.H. (2020). Architecture Spaces to Promote Intergenerational-Friendly Environment.
98. Unal Cilek, M., Altunkasa, M.F., & Uslu, C. (2023). Urban residents' attitudes towards the impact of public spaces on urban life quality: the case of Adana. Open House International. [DOI:10.1108/OHI-01-2023-0007]
99. Vahid Vahdat Talab, M. (2010). Bio-aesthetic: An investigation of the role of biological features in aesthetic evaluation of architectural works (Doctoral dissertation, Shahid Beheshti University, Faculty of Art and Architecture). [in Persian]
100. Vannucci, M., Gori, S. & Kojima, H. (2014). The spatial frequencies influence the aesthetic judgment of buildings transculturally. Cognitive Neuroscience, 5(3-4): 143-149. [DOI:10.1080/17588928.2014.976188]
101. Vartanian, O., Navarrete, G., Chatterjee, A., Fich, L. B., Leder, H., Modroño, C., & Skov, M. (2013). Impact of contour on aesthetic judgments and approach-avoidance decisions in architecture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110 (Supplement 2): 10446-10453. [DOI:10.1073/pnas.1301227110]
102. Villa, S. B., Bortoli, K. C. R. d., & Oliveira, L. V. (2025). Resilient House Evaluation Matrix: Attributes and Quality Indicators for Social Housing. Buildings, 15(5), 793.
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15050793 [DOI:10.3390/buildings15050793.]
103. Vitruvius. (2012). The ten books on architecture (Rima Fayaz, Trans.). Tehran: University of Art. [in Persian]
104. Wang, Z., Shen, M., & Huang, Y. (2024). Combining Eye-Tracking Technology and Subjective Evaluation to Determine Building Facade Color Combinations and Visual Quality. Applied Sciences. [DOI:10.3390/app14188227]
105. White, EV & Gatersleben B. (2011). Greenery on residential buildings: Does it affect preferences and perceptions of beauty? Journal of Environmental Psychology 31(1): 39-98. [DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.11.002]
106. Wittek, Arnold. (2006). Foundations of aesthetics in urban environments. Urban Studies Journal, 17-18: 28-39. [in Persian]
107. Yi, Y. K. (2019) Building facade multi-obiective optimization for daylight and aesthetical perception Building and Environment, 156: 178-190. [DOI:10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.04.002]
108. Zhang, D., & Tu, Y. (2021). Green building, pro-environmental behavior and well-being: Evidence from Singapore. Cities, 108, 102980. [DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2020.102980]
109. Zhang, H., Nam, N. D., & Hu, Y.-C. . (2020). The Impacts of Visual Factors on Residenta Perception, Emotion and Place Attachment. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 5(14): 237-243. [DOI:10.21834/ebpj.v5i14.2207]
110. Zhong, S., Hahm, Y., Chen, X., Wang, N., & Lee, C. (2025). Environmental factors influencing intergenerational interactions in residential communities: A US nationwide survey of built environment experts. Habitat International. [DOI:10.1016/j.habitatint.2025.103296]
111. Ziemeļniece, A., & Īle, U. (2023). The Research for Aesthetic Quality of Residential Areas in Latvia and Finland. Architecture and Urban Planning, 19: 209 - 216. [DOI:10.2478/aup-2023-0019]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
