----------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------
year 5, Issue 2 (Semi-Annual 2020)                   CIAUJ 2020, 5(2): 91-106 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Medghalchi L, Mirgholami M, Nilipour M. Explaining the Model of Cultural Planning of Urban Parks. CIAUJ. 2020; 5 (2) :91-106
URL: http://ciauj-tabriziau.ir/article-1-255-en.html
1- Tabriz Islamic Art University , l.medghalchi@tabriziau.ac.ir
2- Tabriz Islamic Art University
Abstract:   (3906 Views)
In Iran, urban parks are one of the most important urban spaces. In the last one or two decades, with the changes that have taken place in the Iranian way of life, social interactions and the type of activity of people in urban parks have changed. What needs to be considered in this regard is how to plan for urban parks for the use of different age and sex groups. To do that, you need to discover the cultural resources of urban parks and the discovery of cultural resources is possible through cultural planning. Cultural planning has become one of the key approaches in urban planning. Cultural planning is a new place-based approach within which urban parks designers, planners and managers view culture. Cultural planning uses cultural resources in urban planning and urban parks include many types of cultural resources; therefore, it seems urban parks are one of the best places to be selected for cultural planning. Cultural planning uses cultural resources to enhance urban and community development. Cultural resources as the core part of cultural planning play a key role to form the pattern of events in urban parks. Cultural resources in urban parks can be categorized as urban parks, visible elements, and events (tangible resources); and meanings and associations (intangible resources). Elements and events present in urban parks are capable of evoking meanings and associations for them and lead them to form activities and events. These elements consist of man-made elements, natural elements, sensory elements, humans, animals and plants. Urban parks designers, planners and managers need to consider these elements and related events as tangible cultural resources that can be altered, replaced or reinforced. The tangible cultural resources in urban parks can lead to evoke meanings and associations for users as intangible cultural resources. The present study sought to find a model of cultural planning of urban parks. Interpretive methods have been used to study the theoretical foundations and the empirical background and to examine the phenomenon of urban park, cultural resources and the pattern of its events.  Finally, the proposed model is presented. The findings show that the cultural planning of urban parks includes various stages that need to be done in order to achieve the desired result. The first step is to choose the field of study. It is necessary to choose an urban park that has enough variety of elements and events, as well as meanings and associations for users. In the second step, cultural mapping, the cultural resources in the studied urban park are identified, including tangible cultural resources (elements and events) and intangible cultural resources (meanings and associations). In the third step, cultural assessment, the approach of urban park managers and policy makers towards cultural resources is analyzed and in the final step, creative methods are used to make optimal use of cultural resources to improve the urban park. First, the hierarchical method of urban park facilities is used to ensure that the facilities of the parks are adequate and appropriate to the needs of the community. Later on, the range of recreational opportunities appropriate to cultural resources and the diversity of users in terms of age, gender, ethnicity, language and diversity of cultural resources are presented. Conflicts, issues and problems will then be identified. For conflicts, major issues and problems that require immediate action, the approach of issues (categories) is used, and for conflicts, minor issues and problems, the organic or gradual approach is used. To promote the health, welfare and well-being of users, a community development approach is used that can make optimal use of cultural resources to empower the community, increase the sense of identity and sense of belonging to the parks’ users.
 
Full-Text [PDF 1110 kb]   (500 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Applied Article | Subject: Conceptualization of theorizing in Islamic architecture and urban ism
Received: 2020/10/22 | Accepted: 2021/01/23 | ePublished: 2021/02/16

References
1. Alexander, C. 1979. The timeless way of building. Oxford University Press
2. Alexander, C. 2017.The timeless way of building. Translated by M. Qayyumi, Tehran: Rozaneh. [In Persian]
3. Arnold, M. 1869, Culture and anarchy, retrieved from http://public-library.uk/ebooks/25/79.pdf
4. Bianchini, F. 2004. A crisis in urban creativity? Reflections on the cultural impacts of globalisation, and on the potential of urban cultural policies. Paper presented at the international symposium The Age of the City: the Challenges for Creative Cites, Osaka, February 7th-10th.
5. Bianchini, F.& Ghilardi, L. 2007. Thinking culturally about place. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 3(4) [DOI:10.1057/palgrave.pb.6000077]
6. Blaikie, N. 2017. Approaches to social enquiry. Translated by S.H.R. Hasani, M.T. Iman, S.M. Majedi. Qom: Research Institute of Hawzah and University. [In Persian]
7. Burgess, J., Harrison, C.M., & Limb, M. 1988. People, parks and the urban green: A study of popular meanings and values for open spaces in the city. Urban Studies, 25, 455-473. [DOI:10.1080/00420988820080631]
8. Campbell, L.K., Svendsen, E.S., Sonti, N.F., & Johnson, M.L. 2016. A social assessment of urban parkland: Analyzing park use and meaning to inform management and resilience planning. Environmental Science & Policy, 62, 34-44. [DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.014]
9. Chiesura, A. 2004. The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 68, 129-138. [DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.08.003]
10. Dartigues, A. 2017. Quest-ce que la phenomenology. Translated by M. Navali. Tehran: Samt. [in Persian]
11. Davari Ardakani, R. 2008. Wisdom and time; conversations. Tehran: Sokhan. [In Persian]
12. Dehkhoda, A.A. 2011. Dehkhoda dictionary. Tehran: Dehkhoda. [In Persian]
13. DeVito, J.A. 2012. The interpersonal communication book. USA: Pearson.
14. Ejlali, P.; Anjam Shoa, R. 2012. Everyday life in urban parks: A comparative study of Tehran and Kerman parks. Iranian Journal of Sociology, 13 (3), 111-148 [In Persian]
15. Ellis, S.M. 2011. Intangible cultural resources: values are in the mind. in King, T. F. (ed.), A companion to cultural resource management, Blackwell. [DOI:10.1002/9781444396065.ch9]
16. Eslami Tanha, A. 2014. Phenomenological theory of culture and cultural policy, Quarterly Journal of Religion and Cultural Policy 1 (2), 31-59. [In Persian]
17. Fitzpatrick, A. 2009. Cultural planning as an instrument for locating Ontario provincial parks within the valuable landscape of a community, Master's thesis, the University of Waterloo
18. Gee, K., & Burkhard, B. 2010. Cultural ecosystem services in the context of offshore wind farming: a case study from the west coast of Schleswig-Holstein. Ecol. Complexity, 7(3), 349-358. [DOI:10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.02.008]
19. Ghilardi, L. 2001. Cultural planning and cultural diversity, In T. Bennett (Ed.), Differing diversities: Cultural policy and cultural diversity (pp. 123-134), Council of Europe Publishing
20. Ghilardi, L. 2005. Culture at the centre: Cultural planning-A strategic approach to successful and sustainable community-based regeneration in Scotland, Noema research and Planning Ltd, London.
21. Ghilardi, L. 2010. Ambitious and resourceful cultural planners, Noema Research and Planning Ltd.
22. Hall, S. 2017. Representation: cultural representations and signifying practices. Translated by A. Golmohammadi. Tehran: Ney. [In Persian]
23. Harrison, K.D. 2007. When languages die: The extinction of the world's languages and the erosion of human knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Hazeri, A.M., Mehraein, M. 2002. Different approaches to the study of culture with emphasis on the methodological dimension. Journal of Social Sciences 17(20). [In Persian]
25. King, T.F. 2011. A companion to cultural resource management. Blackwell. [DOI:10.1002/9781444396065.ch30]
26. Kokab, S. 2004. Husserl's phenomenology, the transition from the solipsistic experience to the intersubjective experience. Culture of Thought 12 [In Persian]
27. Krenichyn, K. 2006. The only place to go and be in the city: women talk about exercise, being outdoors, and the meanings of a large urban park. Health & Place, 12, 631-643. [DOI:10.1016/j.healthplace.2005.08.015]
28. Loukil, B., Bouraoui, M., & Donadieu, P. 2010. Urban parks in Tunisia: why and for whom?. Acta Hortic, 881, 759-765. [DOI:10.17660/ActaHortic.2010.881.125]
29. Madayen, S.M.A., Haghi, A., Javareshkian, A. 2017. The Meaning of essence and existence in Husserl's phenomenology and transcendent wisdom, Belief-Theological Research 7 (28), 145-160. [In Persian]
30. Main, K. 2013. Planting roots in foreign soil? Immigrant place meanings in an urban park. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 291-304. [DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.08.003]
31. Manzo, L.C. 2005. For better or worse: Exploring multiple dimensions of place meaning. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(1), 67-86. [DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.01.002]
32. Mercer, C. 2010. A global view: The cultural turn in urban planning. in G. Baeker, (ed.), Rediscovering the wealth of places: a municipal cultural planning handbook for Canadian communities, St Thomas, Ontario, Municipal World Inc.
33. Monk, G.; Winslade, J.; Sinclair, S. 2008. New horizons in multicultural counseling, USA: sage publications. [DOI:10.4135/9781483329260]
34. Morse-Kahn, D. 2011. History as a cultural resource. in King, T. F. (ed.), A companion to cultural resource management, Blackwell. [DOI:10.1002/9781444396065.ch7]
35. Norberg-Shulz, C. 2012. Architectur: presence, language, place. Translated by A. Seyed Ahmadian. Tehran: Publishing Architect. [In Persian]
36. Pakzad, J. 2018. An intellectual history of urbanism. Tehran: Shahidi. [In Persian]
37. Parsa, M. 2010. New general psychology. Tehran: Besat. [In Persian]
38. Parvaneh, M. 2013. Design of urban squares with the approach of instilling a sense of place (a case of Rasht Square). Master Thesis in Urban Design, Guilan University. [In Persian]
39. Perley, B.C. 2011. Language as an integrated cultural resource. in King, T. F. (ed.), A companion to cultural resource management, Blackwell. [DOI:10.1002/9781444396065.ch11]
40. Peters, K. 2010. Being together in urban parks: Connecting public space, leisure, and diversity. Leisure Sciences, 32, 418-433. [DOI:10.1080/01490400.2010.510987]
41. Rahbarnia, Z.; Mehrizi Thani, S. 2008. Explain the boundaries between realistic, abstract, and abstract photography. Fine Arts 33, 85-94. [In Persian]
42. Rapoport, A. 1990. The meaning of the built environment, a nonverbal communication approach. USA: The University of Arizona Press
43. Rapoport, A. 2013. The meaning of the built environment: a nonverbal communication approach. Translated by F. Habib. Tehran: Urban Processing and Planning. [In Persian]
44. Relph, E. C. 1976. Place and placelessness. London: Pion Limited.
45. Rennit, P., & Maikov, K. 2015. Perceived restoration scale method turned into (used as the) evaluation tool for parks and open green spaces, using Tartu city parks as an example. City, Territory and Architecture, 2(6), 1-11. [DOI:10.1186/s40410-014-0020-3]
46. Rezazadeh, R. 2004. Investigating the role of architecture in associating meanings and conveying concepts, Fine Arts 18, 37-48. [In Persian]
47. Salehi Amiri, S.R. 2017. Cultural concepts and theories. Tehran: Qoqnus. [In Persian]
48. Sattari, J. 2001. Culture: In the statelessness of culture, in a conversation with Ali Dehbashi. [In Persian]
49. Sheibani, S. 1970. Some definitions of culture, Journal of Culture and Life 2, 115-121. [In Persian]
50. Smith, D.W., & McIntyre, R. 1982. Husserl and intentionality: A study of mind, meaning, and language. Springer. [DOI:10.1007/978-94-010-9383-5]
51. Stevenson, D. 2005. Cultural planning in Australia: texts and contexts, The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 35(1), 36-48 [DOI:10.3200/JAML.35.1.36-48]
52. Stewart, W. 2008. Place meanings in stories of lived experience. in Kruger, L.E.; Hall, T.E.; & Stiefel, M.C. (ed.). Understanding concepts of place in recreation research and management. Portland, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
53. Tylor, E. 1871. Primitive Culture: Research into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Art, and Custum. London: John Murray.
54. Williams, R. 1961. The long revolution. Chatto & Windus. [DOI:10.7312/will93760]
55. Willow, A.J. 2011. Culturally significant natural resources: Where nature and culture meet. in King, T.F. (ed.), A companion to cultural resource management. Blackwell. [DOI:10.1002/9781444396065.ch6]
56. Worpole, K., Greenhalgh, L. 1995. Park life: urban parks and social renewal. UK: Demos.
57. Wynveen, C. J., Kyle, G.T., & Sutton, S.G. 2010. Place meanings ascribed to marine settings: The case of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park. Leisure Sciences, 32, 270-287. [DOI:10.1080/01490401003712705]
58. Yazdani, N. 2017. Migration, landscape, and culture: urban parks and Iranian immigrants in Melbourne. Ph.D. Thesis, Deakin University.
59. Zerlang, M. 2005. The cultural turn in contemporary urban planning. in Østergaard K. ed, Cultural Planning, The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts School of Architecture.
60. Zhou, M., Huang, L., Shen, Z. 2018. Community renewal strategy from the perspective of cultural planning: A case study on Caohuajie community in Chongqing International review for spatial planning and sustainable development A: planning strategies and design concepts 6(1). [DOI:10.14246/irspsd.6A.1_1]

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2022 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Culture of Islamic Architecture and Urbanism Journal

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb