year 5, Issue 2 (Fall & Winter 2020)                   CIAUJ 2020, 5(2): 1-15 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Soltani M. The Reflection of Collective Memory in Architectural Studies. CIAUJ. 2020; 5 (2) :1-15
URL: http://ciauj-tabriziau.ir/article-1-261-en.html
University of Bonab , mahdisoltani@ubonab.ac.ir
Abstract:   (1776 Views)
Today, interdisciplinary studies have found an important place in the literature of architectural studies. One of the new concepts in the field of historiography and social sciences is "collective memory". This concept was first discussed in detail by Maurice Halbwachs and later described and interpreted by other scholars in various scientific fields. Collective memories are events experienced by individuals in a social framework and in interaction with the group. The reminder of these memories occurs using the mechanism of association of meanings and through objects, individuals, places and similar experiences, and in other words, collective memory means a shared memory with a group or society. The collective memory has differences and similarities with history and is tied to the concepts of identity and social belonging and has a connection to the concept of place. Although the experience of a place occurs individually, the shared experiences resulting from social categories and individual characteristics resulting from these categories ultimately lead to the receiving, storage and recording of these receives within the framework of shared social memories.  In this article, by recognizing the different aspects of the concept of collective memory and its relationship with different areas of architectural studies, the quality of its use in architectural studies is examined, and some resources for this study are suggested. Accordingly, different texts have been explored by the interpretive method of study and by logical reasoning, the relationship between this concept and different fields of study has been proposed. This concept can be used in various stages of architectural studies such as studying religious buildings, creating memories in places, designing monumental spaces and studying the design of urban spaces. The relationship between this concept and architecture can be searched through sources such as written sources, visual and oral sources. Informal written sources are more honest and reliable in understanding collective memories related to architecture, and examining them critically can open valuable windows to understanding collective memories. Oral mediators of memories are also valuable resources that are somewhat immune to deliberate distortion. These oral sources can include the collective memories of ordinary people, technicians and builders of architectural works, the words of other witnesses and users of works, and the like. Collective memories can also be studied as an important and valuable part of the place and architectural works. The presence of collective memories in cities strengthens the sense of identity and belonging to the city. Collective memories are the main aspect of the study in some architectural works such as monuments. The continuity of life in religious buildings is closely related to the preservation and strengthening of collective memories, and also the life of public spaces and the extent to which people belong to them are correlated with the presence and continuity of collective memories. Different aspects of this concept can be identified and applied in different areas of architectural study. Collective memories at different stages of the development of human societies are recorded and stored in various sources. These sources can assist the researcher in such a study.
 
Full-Text [PDF 1128 kb]   (131 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research |
Received: 2020/09/5 | Accepted: 2020/12/10 | ePublished: 2021/02/16

References
1. Ananahad, Mahmoud, Hamzeh Gholam Alizadeh, and Farzaneh Asadi MalekJahan. 2019. Assessing the Role of Collective Memory in the Process of Rasht's Saqarisazan Houses and Old Texture Revitalization. Armanshar Journal of Architecture and Urban Development 27(12): 131-144. [In Persian].
2. Assmann, Jan. 1995. Collective Memory and Cultural Identity. New German Critique.65:125-133. [DOI:10.2307/488538]
3. Brian, E. 2008. Portée du lexique halbwachsien de la mémoire. In: Halbwachs, M (ed.) La Topographie Légendaire des Evangiles en Terre Sainte. Paris: PUF, 113-145.
4. Burkett, Christopher Paul. 2009. Homiletics as Mnemonic Practice: Collective Memory and Contemporary Christian Preaching With Special Reference to the Work of Mauric Halbwaches (PhD Thesis), University of Liverpool, 63-69.
5. Carpenedo, Manoela. 2017. Collective memory in the making of religious change: the case of 'emerging Jews' followers of Jesus. Religion 48(1): 83-104. [DOI:10.1080/0048721X.2017.1386136]
6. Collins, Randall. 2004. Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Dayan [DOI:10.1515/9781400851744]
7. Coser,L.A. 1992. The revival of the sociology of culture:The Case of collective memory. Sociological Forum 7(2):365-373. [DOI:10.1007/BF01125050]
8. Doss, Erik. 2008. The Emotional Life of Contemporary Public Memorials: Towards a Theory of Temporary Memorials. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. [DOI:10.5117/9789089640185]
9. Esmaeilian, Sahar, and Ehsan Ranjbar. 2014. Finding Main Effective Factors of Creating and Transition of Collective Memory in Urban Public Spaces, Case Study: Tehran: Tajrish Square, Baharestan Square, and Plaza City Theater. Armanshar Journal of Architecture and Urban Development 11(6): 181-194. [In Persian].
10. Eyerman R. 2002. Cultural trauma: Slavery and the Information of African American Identity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511488788]
11. Galloway,Anne. 2008. Collective Remembering and the Importance of Forgetting, a Critical Design Challenge. Carleton: Carleton University.
12. H.Hutton,Patrick. 1988. Collective Memory and Collective Mentalities: The Halbwachs-Aries Connection, Historical Reflections 15(2):311-322.
13. Habibi, Seyed Mohsen. 1999. Urban Space, Events, and Collective memories. Soffe 28(9): 16-21. [In Persian].
14. Hague, Cliff. 2005. Planning and Place identity. In Place, identity, participation and planning. Ed. Cliff Hauge and Paul Jenkins. London: Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9780203646755]
15. Halbwachs,M. 1992. On Collective Memory.Trans.and ed.L.A.Coser. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226774497.001.0001]
16. Hasani Khoshdareghi, Asiyeh, and Mohammad Hoseyn Abedi. 2015. Collective memories and the concept of sense of belonging in traditional architecture and how to revive it in today's architecture. In National Conference on Iranian Islamic Architecture and Urbanism: Rasht, Iran. [In Persian].
17. Hasani Mianroudi, Nasim, Hamid Majedi, Zahra Sadat Saeide Zarabadi, and Yousefali Ziari. 2018. Exploring Concept of Collective Memory and its Retrieval in Urban Areas with Semiotic Approach (Case study: Hasan-Abad square). BAGH-E-NAZAR 56 (16): 17-32. [In Persian].
18. Heidenreich,Luise. 1995. Collective Memory, Identity and Place Making In Reunified Berlin. 10-15.
19. Hirst, William, and Gerald Echterhoff. 2012. Remembering inConversations: The SocialSharing and Reshapingof Memories. Annual Review of Psychology 63: 55-79. [DOI:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100340]
20. Holloway, Lewis and Hubbard Phil.2001. People and Place. London: Pearson Education.
21. Iranmanesh,Nasrin, and Elham Amini. 2013. Creating Collective Memories in Urban Spaces of Iran. Real Corp 2013: 195-203.
22. J. Savelsberg, Joachim, Ryan D. King. 2007. Law and Collective Memory. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 3: 189-211. [DOI:10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.3.081806.112757]
23. Jaisson, M .2008. Mémoire collective et espace social. In: Halbwachs, M La Topographie Légendaire des Evangiles en Terre Sainte. Paris: PUF, 73-97.
24. K. Olick, Jeffrey, and Joyce Robbins.1998. Social Memory Studies: From "Collective Memory" to the Historical Sociology of Mnemonic Practice. Annual Review of Sociology 24: 105-140. [DOI:10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.105]
25. K.Olick,Jeffrey, ,Vered Vinitzky Seroussi, and, Daniel Levy. 2011. The Collective Memory Reader, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Koolhaas, Rem. 1995. Generic City. Translated by Maryam Amini. Name Farhangh 2 (3): 65-81.
27. Le Goff J. 1992. History and Memory. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
28. Lewicka, Maria. 2008. Place attachment, place identity, and place memory: restoring the forgotten city past. Journal of Environmental Psychology 28(3): 209-231. [DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.02.001]
29. Mirmoghtadaee, Mahta. 2009. Criteria for measuring the possibility of formation, registration and transfer of collective memories in the city, Case study: Tehran. Journal of fine arts 37: 5-16. [In Persian].
30. Misztal, Barbara. 2003. Durkheim on Collective Memory. Journal of Classical Sociology 3(2): 123-143. [DOI:10.1177/1468795X030032002]
31. Naderi, Ahmad, Mahdi Akbari Golzar, Zahra Fazeli. 2019. Collective Memory and Its Impact on the Formation of Urban Identity (Case Study: Vahdat-e-Islami and Shahrak-e-Gharb). Quarterly of Social Studies and Research in Iran: 3(8): 533-556. [In Persian].
32. Norberg-Schulz, Christian. 1988. Architecture, Meaning and Place. Translated by Vida Norouz Barazjani. Tehran: Jane Jahan. Press. [In Persian].
33. Paez, Dario, Besabe, Nekane, and Gonzalez, Jose Luis .1997. Social processes and collective memory: a crosscultural approach to remembering political events. In: Collective Memory of Political Events, Social Psychological Perspectives, Ed. James W. Pennebaker, Dario Paez & Bernard Rimé Mahwah. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34. Qayyumi-Bidehendi, Mehrdad. A speech in written sources of The History of Iranian Architecture and the Way they Are Searched .2009. Golestan-E-Honar 15: 5-20. [In Persian].
35. Rico, p. 1995. Forgotten Historical Memory. Journal of talks 8:49. [In Persian].
36. Rossi, Aldo. 1982. The Architecture of the City, Massachusett: The Institute for Architecture and Urban Studies and the Massachusett's Institute of Technology.
37. Sarvari, Hadi, and Arghavan Rahimzadeh Nasakhi. 2015. The Role of Collective Memories in Urban Spaces. In National Conference on Identity-Oriented Architecture and Urbanism, Mashhad, Iran. [In Persian].
38. Sas, Gorina, and Alan Dix .2006. Designing for Collective Remembering. Lancter: Lancter University. [DOI:10.1145/1125451.1125773]
39. Schieder T. 1978. The role of historical consciousness in political action. Hist. Theory 17:1-18. [DOI:10.2307/2504707]
40. Siew-wai lim, William. 2000. Memories and urban places, City 4(2): 270-277. [DOI:10.1080/13604810050147875]
41. Tarkashvand, Abbad, Heydar Jahanbakhsh, and Maryam Kariminejad. 2017. Recognition of Components Affecting the Formation of Identity and Collective Memory Around Historic Bridges (Case Study: Langroud City). Journal of Iranian Architecture & Urbanism 1 (8): 5-14. [In Persian].
42. Truc,Gerome. 2011. Memory of Places and Places of Memory: For a Halbwachsian Socio-Ethnography of Collective memory. International Social Science Journal 62:147-159 [DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2451.2011.01800.x]
43. Urbaniak, Jakub. 2015. Religion as memory. Theological Studies 71(3). [DOI:10.4102/hts.v71i3.2815]
44. Zeuler, Lima, and Vera M. Pallamin .1998. Architecture and Memory: References in Contemporary Culture. In ACSA West Central Region Conference. Washington University, Saint Louise. 1-11.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


© 2021 All Rights Reserved | Culture of Islamic Architecture and Urbanism Journal

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb