Volume 7, Issue 1 (Semi-Annual 2022)
CIAUJ 2022, 7(1): 21-35 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Bakhtiari N, Shaliamini V, Pourzargar M. Ananalysis of the Issue of Interpretation in the Architecture of the Subculture. CIAUJ 2022; 7 (1) :21-35
URL: http://ciauj-tabriziau.ir/article-1-362-en.html
URL: http://ciauj-tabriziau.ir/article-1-362-en.html
1- Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, Islamic Azad University Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, Islamic Azad University Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran ,vah.shali_amini@iauctb.ac.ir
2- Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, Islamic Azad University Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran ,
Abstract: (1560 Views)
The present article is deductive and is based on the analysis of concepts and theory. The paradigm of this research is interpretive and it intends to interpret the phenomenon of subcultural architecture accurately. The approach of the present article is deductive and is based on the analysis of concepts and theory. The method of analysis is based on the careful study of theoretical data based on the semiotic theory of Umberto Eco. Data were collected through library studies. An important and fundamental point of the architecture of Iranian subculture houses for this study is the combination of majority and minority cultures. As mentioned, the method of this integration is different in the geographical areas of Iran. The analyzes showed that the interpretation of architectural buildings in minority culture differs from the interpretation of buildings for three reasons: First. In process, syntactic and semantic codes. In process ciphers, the elements of the first system ciphers are linked to anonymous system ciphers. This anonymity delays Will's formation and therefore allows him to create a creative appearance. In syntactic coding it is possible to have a different coexistence of architectural components. In semantic codes, the expressive forms of majority culture and minority culture are usually interpreted and referred to as minority culture. Second, the knowledge that the machine of those signs refers to the meanings in the mind of the audience is not historically supported in the minority culture and therefore will be vague for the population of the minority group for others and will be clarified only by historical studies and culture. Third is the existence of two groups of audiences. The people of the minority group and the people of the majority group who have the minority culture in their hearts.
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
Conceptualization of theorizing in Islamic architecture and urban ism
Received: 2022/05/21 | Accepted: 2022/08/16 | ePublished: 2022/09/21
Received: 2022/05/21 | Accepted: 2022/08/16 | ePublished: 2022/09/21
References
1. Bianchi, Cinzia. & Gieri, Michel. 2009. Eco's semiotic theory. In P. Bondanella (Ed.), New Essays on Umberto Eco (pp. 17-33). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511627033.003]
2. Blouki, Sajjad. Akhovvat, Haniyeh. 2014. A comparative study of similarities and differences between Muslim and Zoroastrian houses in Yazd. Iranian Islamic City Studies, 6(22): 51-66. [In Persian]
3. Dabbagh, Amir Masoud., Mokhtabadamrii, Mustafa. 2018. Interpretation of postmodern architecture from the perspective of semiotics. City Identity, 5(9): 59-72. [In Persian]
4. Danesi, Marcel. 2007. The Quest for Meaning: A Guide to Semiotic Theory and Practice. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
5. Eco, Umberto, 2013. Semiotics, translated by Pirouz Izadi, Tehran: third edition. [In Persian]
6. Eco, Umberto. 1976. A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-349-15849-2]
7. Eco, Umberto. 1981. The Theory of signs and the Role of the Reader. The bulletin of the Modern Language Association, 14 (1): 35-45 [DOI:10.2307/1314865]
8. Eco, Umberto. 1987. How an Exposition Exposes Itself? Travels in Hyperreality. Trans William Weaver. London: Pan Books, 296-9.
9. Eco, Umberto. 2005. Function and the sign the semiotics of architecture in Rethinking Architecture. Taylor
10. Hasani, Kianoush. Nowrozbrazjani, Vida. 2017. A new pattern of shape grammar in today's house architecture, case example: Qajar houses in Tabriz and Tehran. Bagh Nazar, 15(63): 29-40. [In Persian]
11. Kara-Ahmadi, Mehran. Kayani, Mustafa. Ghasemi Sichani, Maryam. 2017. A comparative study of the architecture of Armenian schools and French missionaries in the city of Isfahan in the contemporary period from the perspective of historical and stylistic developments. Restoration and architecture of Iran (restoration of historical and cultural works and textures), 8(15): 137-154. [In Persian]
12. Karimi, Leila, Gulfam, Arslan, Ameri, Hayat. 2016. Semiotic factors affecting the quality of expression In Persian language: a listener-centered analysis. Linguistic essays, 8(4 (39)): 71-95. [In Persian]
13. Memarian, Gholamhossein. Hashemi Taghraljardi, Majid. Kamalipour, Hossam. 1389. The effect of religious culture on the formation of the house, a comparative comparison of the house in the Muslim, Zoroastrian and Jewish neighborhood of Kerman. Cultural Research of Iran, 3(2 (10)): 1-25. [In Persian]
14. Panahi, Siamak. Hashempour, Rahim. Eslami, Gholamreza. 2013. Architecture of thought, from idea to concept. City identity, 8 (17): 25-34. [In Persian]
15. Sarmestani, Mohammad. Foroutan, Manouchehr. and Tahouri, Nair. 2017. Poetic creation in the urban space: semiotic analysis of the urban space of Bagh Boland, Shiraz. City Identity, 12(34): 67-78. [In Persian]
16. Sojudi, Farzan. 2015. Semiotics: theory and practice (collection of articles), Tehran: Alam. [In Persian]
17. Vaezi, Mohammadreza, Azizi, Shadi. and Mousavi, Hamidreza. 2017. Presenting a new perspective in architectural design with Umberto Eco's semantics approach. New Attitudes in Human Geography (Human Geography), 10(4): 251-265. [In Persian]
18. Zamani, Hajar. 2008. The influence of Isfahan church decorations on Safavid period architecture. Islamic Art Studies, 5(8): 69-86. [In Persian]
19. ZeraatPisheh, Mohsen, Hosseini, Sara. 2013, the position of minority architecture in the modern architectural trends of the world and Iran, national conference of 100 years of architecture and contemporary urban planning of Iran, Karaj. [In Persian]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
