----------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------
year 7, Issue 2 (Semi-Annual 2022)                   CIAUJ 2022, 7(2): 193-208 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mousavi S M, Sameh R. Application of Modeling Tools in the Architectural Design Process Based on Compass Geometry Principles. CIAUJ 2022; 7 (2) :193-208
URL: http://ciauj-tabriziau.ir/article-1-366-en.html
1- Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran
2- Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran , rsameh@arc.ikiu.ac.ir
Abstract:   (1218 Views)
In this study, a design method is presented based on the compass geometry. After invention and development of Cartesian coordinates system, world had undergone a significant change and it is said that every technological device and architecture software such as laser cutters, 3-D printers, AutoCad, 3Ds Max and so forth, has been working with the principles of this geometrical system. Therefore, the compass geometrical space is long forgotten since the invention of the Cartesian coordinates system. So, due to this considerable alteration, the application of this geometrical system in Iran’s architecture had been forgotten after the world’s major development. The compass had been the main Iranian architect’s tool in the past eras and due to this fact, the designed products of that time were usually based on arcs, so it is argued that there has to be some fundamental differences with the compass geometry and Descartes geometry. There seems to be a relative approach in Cartesian geometrical system, on contrary, Iranian architects considered the geometry as a quite qualitative issue and because of this fact, the proportions between different parts of a building were much more important rather than the quantitative issues such as dimensions. The lack of architecture plans like the ones that are available in its current form regarded to be a crucial issue that has given rise to lack of acquaintance of methods and design devices of Iran’s historical architecture. This research tried to express the characteristics of this geometric space and the challenges that an architect may come across in the design process with this system and also its fundamental differences between Descartes’ geometric space. In addition, providing a simple model of a tool that can produce form in this geometric space is considered to be another important objective of this research. In order to achieve this purpose, at first, a paradigm based on the compass geometry space was simulated. At the next step, nine prototype tools with different capabilities were presented based on the simulated paradigm. And finally, a tool was designed and after that, a related architectural design was modeled with the designed tool. Presenting this tool and designing a prototype based on it are among the results of this article. The main questions of this research are: what are the origins of the compass geometry, what tools are needed, and how they can be used. Pursuing these questions would give rise to the results such as reproducing Persian architecture, more accurate analysis of this architecture, and providing a new tool that is compatible with Iranian culture. The methodology of this research was conducted based on a scientific paradigm which is associated with analogical reasoning that three strategies- comparison of Cartesian and the Compass geometry, logical strategy, and the simulation of the Compass geometry- have been carried out. To achieve this goal, at the first step, the roots of the current western architecture was explained and a comparative study between Descartes’ and compass geometry in Iran’s architecture was carried out. Then, the characteristics of compass geometry and the rules based on this geometrical space were explained. In the next step, the compass’ geometrical space was simulated based on this system. And finally, a design pattern was modeled and presented based on this geometry.
Full-Text [PDF 2413 kb]   (464 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: Identifying the way of life based on the three components of the body, lifestyle and concepts - meanings
Received: 2022/05/22 | Accepted: 2022/10/17 | ePublished: 2023/02/27

References
1. Aghayani Chavoshi, Jafar. 2005. Comparing the methods of Abolufai Bozjani, Leonardo da Vinci and Albrecht Dürer in drawing regular pentagons. Ayenemiras 28 (3): 1-28. [In Persian]
2. Allen, T. 1988. Aniconism and figural representation in Islamic art. In T. Allen (Ed.), Five essays on Islamic art (pp. 17-37). Sebastapol, CA: Solipsist.
3. Belting, H. 2011. Florence and Baghdad: Renaissance art and Arab science (D. L. Schneider, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. Berggren, J. L. 2008. Episodes in the mathematics of medieval Islam. New York: Springer.
5. Bier, C. 2012. The decagonal tomb tower at Maragha and its architectural context: Lines of mathematical thought. Nexus Network Journal. Vol 14(2), 251-273. [DOI:10.1007/s00004-012-0108-6]
6. Bloom, J.M., Blair, S.S. 2009. The grove encyclopedia of Islamic art and architecture. New York: Oxford University. [DOI:10.1093/acref/9780195309911.001.0001]
7. Broug, E. 2013. Islamic geometric design. London: Thames & Hudson.
8. Broug, Eric. 2013. Islamic geometric design in Islamic Architecture. (M. Hatefi Trans.). Simay E Danesh. [In Persian]
9. Burckhardt, Titus. 2009. Art of Islam: language and meaning. Indiana: World Wisdom.
10. Cheema, S., Gulwani, S., LaViola, J.J. 2012. Quickdraw: improving drawing experience for geometric diagrams. In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '12. Pp.1037-1064. [DOI:10.1145/2207676.2208550]
11. Chorbachi, W. K., & Loeb, A. D. 1992. An Islamic pentagonal seal (from scientific manuscripts of the geometry of design). In I. Hargittai (Ed.), Fivefold symmetry (pp. 283-305). Singapore: World Scientific. [DOI:10.1142/9789814439497_0018]
12. Eezadpanah, Hoda. 2016. Drawing methods and application of regular polygon in Islamic mathematics. Masters thesis. Tarbiat Modares University. [In Persian]
13. El-Said, Issam. 2018. Geometric concepts in Islamic art. (M. Rajabnia Trans.). Seda o Sima press. [In Persian]
14. Falamaki, Mansour. 2013. The formation of architecture in the experiences of Iran and the West. Tehran: Faza press.
15. Freedberg, D. 1989. The power of images: Studies in the history and theory of response. Chicago/ London: University of Chicago Press. [DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226259031.001.0001]
16. Gere, Cathy. 2009. Knossos and the prophet of modernism. Chicago: University of Chicago press. [DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226289557.001.0001]
17. Grabar, O. 1992. The mediation of ornament. Princeton: Princeton university press.
18. Grabar, O. 2006. The Dome of the Rock. Cambridge MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University. [DOI:10.2307/j.ctv1pncpt1]
19. King, D. A. 1999. World-maps for finding the direction and distance to Mecca: Innovation and tradition in Islamic science. London/Leiden, Netherlands/Boston: Al-Furqān Islamic Heritage Foundation/Brill. [DOI:10.1163/9789004450738]
20. Kostovskii, A.N. 1988. Compass geometry. (P. Shahriari Trans.). Science Oraganization Press. [In Persian]
21. Lee, Eunsoo. 2018. Let the diagram speak: Compass arcs and visual auxiliaries in printed diagrams of Euclid's elements. Journal of endeavor. Vol (42), 78-98. [DOI:10.1016/j.endeavour.2018.07.010]
22. Levine, albert. 2018. Modern Architecture & Ideology: Mordernism as a political tool in Sweden and the Soviet :union:. Journal of Momentum. Vol (5), 33-52.
23. Morgenthaler, Hans. 2016. The meaning of mordern architecture: Its inner necessity and an emphathetic reading. New York: Routledge.
24. Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. 1992. Science and Civilization in Islam. (A. Aram Trans.). Islamic Texts Society. [In Persian]
25. Necipoğlu, G. (Ed.) 2015. The arts of ornamental geometry: A Persian compendium on similar or complementary interlocking figures (A volume commemorating AlpayO¨ zdural). Leiden and Boston: E. J. Brill.
26. Necipoǧlu, Gülru. 1999. The Topkapi Scroll-Geometry and Ornament in Islamic Architecture: Topkapi Palace Library1956; With an Essay on the Geometry of the Muqarnas by Mohammad al-Asad. Journal of Historia Mathematica. Vol (26), 166-172. [DOI:10.1006/hmat.1999.2234]
27. Olsen, Donald J. 1986. The city as a work of art: London, Paris, Vienna. New Haven: Yale university press. [DOI:10.12987/9780300163216]
28. Özdural, A. 1995. Omar Khayyam, mathematicians, and conversazioni with artisans. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians. Vol 54(1), 54-71. [DOI:10.2307/991025]
29. Rosin, Paul L & Sylvie Duvernoy. 2015. The compass, the ruler and the computer: An analysis of the design of the amphitheatre of Pompeii. Nexus. Vol (?), 21- 34.
30. Rossini, Paolo. 2018. New theories for new instruments: Fabrizio Mordente's proportional compass and the genesis of Giordano Bruno's atomist geometry. Vol (76), 60-68. [DOI:10.1016/j.shpsa.2018.10.004]
31. Salingaros, Nikos A. 2007. A Theory of Architecture. (S. Zarrin & Z. Mottaki Trans.). Urban planning & Architecture Research Center of Iran press. [In Persian]
32. Selaković, Milica; Vesna Marinković & Predrag Janičić. 2020. New dynamics in dynamic geometry: Dragging constructed points. Vol (97), 3-15. [DOI:10.1016/j.jsc.2018.12.002]
33. Smith, Laurie. 2007. An introduction to Daisy Wheel and Vesica Piscis Compass Geometry. ?. Vol (?), 1- 4.
34. Taheri, Jafar & Hadi Nadimi. 2012. Re-appraisal of the Legacy of Abū al-Wafā Būzjānī in Art and Architecture. History of Science Journal. 10(2): 65-91. [In Persian]
35. Taheri, Jafar. 2009. An Introduction to the Knowledge of Mathematics in the Islamic Period: An Inquiry into the Theoretical and Practical Foundations of the Relationship between Mathematics and Islamic Architecture. Doctoral thesis. Shahid Beheshti University. [In Persian]
36. Taheri, Jafar. 2011. A criticism on the research and correction of Bozjani's "Translation of Al-Najara". Science and Technology Journal. 5(2): 4-9. [In Persian]
37. Wijdeveld, Paul. 1994. Ludwig Wittgenstein, Architect. Cambridge: MIT Press. [DOI:10.2307/430995]
38. Williams goldhagen, Sarah. 2005. Something to Talk about: Modernism, Discourse, Style. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians. Vol (64), 144-167. [DOI:10.2307/25068142]

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Culture of Islamic Architecture and Urbanism Journal

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb