Volume 8, Issue 2 (Semi-Annual 2023)
CIAUJ 2023, 8(2): 249-272 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Farahani M, Esmaeizadeh Silabi A, Khosravi H. Contemporary Theoretical Trends in Urban Design (from 2000 to 2022). CIAUJ 2023; 8 (2) :249-272
URL: http://ciauj-tabriziau.ir/article-1-535-en.html
URL: http://ciauj-tabriziau.ir/article-1-535-en.html
1- Urban Design Department, Faculty of Architecture & Urban Planning, University of Art, Tehran , m.mihinraz@gmail.com
2- Department of Horticultural Science and Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Agriculture, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Iran
3- Urban Design Department, Faculty of Architecture & Urban Planning, University of Art, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Horticultural Science and Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Agriculture, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Iran
3- Urban Design Department, Faculty of Architecture & Urban Planning, University of Art, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (1091 Views)
The lack of agreement among experts on the substantive and procedural approach of urban design on the one hand and the growing trend of theoretical studies in the direction of clarifying identical positions on the other hand, shows the necessity of examining contemporary theories in a multi-dimensional continuum. This research aims to verify what are the important contemporary areas of urban design, with the question of whether a kind of thematic alignment can be recognized in terms of theoretical concepts? 43 theoretical articles screened out of a total of 717 articles published in the period from 2000 to 2022 in the urban design magazine and identify 6 topics and 26 tendencies, including: goal with tendencies 1- human-community, 2-space-place, 3-geography- domain 4-Time, scope of intervention with trends 1-texture, 2-public realm, 3-physical levels and public and private areas, 4- infrastructures, 5- social interactions, users and space management, scale with trends 1- detail, 2-Personal building and block, 3-Neighborhood, 4-Urban spaces, region and city, 5- Infrastructure and structure, 6- Region, urban system, urban suburbs, and 7- The world, a product with trends 1- Rule - law, 2-modeling and 3-dimensional, 3-strategy and policy, and 4-program and report, process and method with trends 1- comprehensive and mass-oriented, 2-dynamic and permanent, and 3- mixed and decision-making with trends 1-Scientific experts, 2-Politicians and capitalists, and 3-Public-private partnership and beneficiaries and influencers.
Type of Study: Review |
Subject:
Conceptualization of theorizing in Islamic architecture and urban ism
Received: 2023/08/30 | Accepted: 2023/11/25 | ePublished: 2023/12/29
Received: 2023/08/30 | Accepted: 2023/11/25 | ePublished: 2023/12/29
References
1. Akkerman, A. (2000). Harmonies of urban design and discords of city-form: Urban aesthetics in the rise of western civilization. Journal of urban design, 5(3), 267-290. [DOI:10.1080/713683970]
2. Alexander, C. (1964). Notes on the Synthesis of Form (Vol. 5). Harvard University Press.
3. Appleyard, D., & Jacobs, A. (1982). Toward an urban design manifesto.
4. Aravot, I. (2002). Back to phenomenological placemaking. Journal of urban design, 7(2), 201-212. [DOI:10.1080/1357480022000012230]
5. Banerjee, T. (2014). Urban Design: Scope and Scale of Urban Design. Routledge
6. Barnett, J. (2014). Do Not Define Urban Design too Narrowly. Journal of Urban Design, 19(1), 49-52. [DOI:10.1080/13574809.2014.854682]
7. Ben-Joseph, E., & Gordon, D. (2000). Hexagonal planning in theory and practice. Journal of Urban Design, 5(3), 237-265. [DOI:10.1080/713683965]
8. Bentley, I. (2004). Urban transformations: Power, people and urban design. Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9780203006405]
9. Bentley, I., McGlynn, S., Smith, G., Alcock, A., & Murrain, P. (2013). Responsive environments. Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9780080516172]
10. Biddulph, M. (2012). The problem with thinking about or for urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 17(1), 1-20. [DOI:10.1080/13574809.2011.646251]
11. Biddulph, M. (2000). Villages don't make a city. Journal of Urban Design, 5(1), 65-82. [DOI:10.1080/135748000112981]
12. Birch, E. L., & Silver, C. (2009). One hundred years of city planning's enduring and evolving connections. Journal of the American Planning Association, 75(2), 113-122. [DOI:10.1080/01944360902777031]
13. Boyer, M. C. (2011). The two orders of cybernetics in urban form and design. In Companion to urban design (pp. 70-83). Routledge.
14. Bridgeman‐Sutton, D. (2010). Urban Design Futures. [DOI:10.1080/00207230601099975]
15. Broadbent, G. (1990). Emerging concepts in urban space design.
16. Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T., & Tiesdell, S. (2003). Urban spaces-public places: The dimensions of urban design.
17. Carmona, M., & Tiesdell, S. (Eds.). (2007). Urban design reader. Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9780080468129]
18. Carmona, M. (2010). Contemporary public space: Critique and classification, part one: Critique. Journal of urban design, 15(1), 123-148. [DOI:10.1080/13574800903435651]
19. Carmona, M. (2010). Contemporary public space, part two: Classification. Journal of urban design, 15(2), 157-173. [DOI:10.1080/13574801003638111]
20. Carmona, M. (2014). The place-shaping continuum: A theory of urban design process. Journal of Urban Design, 19(1), 2-36. [DOI:10.1080/13574809.2013.854695]
21. Carmona, M. (2016). Design governance: theorizing an urban design sub-field. Journal of urban Design, 21(6), 705-730. [DOI:10.1080/13574809.2016.1234337]
22. Carmona, M. (2020). To truly 'live', urban design needs accessible interdisciplinary research. Journal of Urban Design, 25(1), 5-9. [DOI:10.1080/13574809.2019.1706319]
23. Childs, M. C. (2020). Urban design foresight. Journal of Urban Design, 25(1), 9-11. [DOI:10.1080/13574809.2019.1706309]
24. Cowan, R. (2006). Urban Design Guidance: Urban Design Frameworks, Development Brief and Master plans, Eslimi. [in Persian]
25. Cozzolino, S., Polívka, J., Fox-Kämper, R., Reimer, M., & Kummel, O. (2020). What is urban design? A proposal for a common understanding. Journal of Urban Design, 25(1), 35-49. [DOI:10.1080/13574809.2019.1705776]
26. Cuthbert, A. R. (2007). Urban design: requiem for an era-review and critique of the last 50 years. Urban Design International, 12(4), 177-223. [DOI:10.1057/palgrave.udi.9000200]
27. Cuthbert, A. (2012). Urban Design and Spatial Political Economy: last 50 years, Tahan. [in Persian]
28. Cuthbert, A. (2020). Eliot's insight-the future of urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 25(1), 11-14. [DOI:10.1080/13574809.2019.1706877]
29. Childs, M. C. (2001). Civic ecosystems. Journal of urban design, 6(1), 55-72. [DOI:10.1080/13574800120032879]
30. Childs, M. C. (2010). A spectrum of urban design roles. Journal of Urban Design, 15(1), 1-19. [DOI:10.1080/13574800903429357]
31. De la Peña, D. (2015). New landscape urbanisms: Promising new paths for urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 20(3), 314-317. [DOI:10.1080/13574809.2015.1030989]
32. Dovey, K. (2020). Urban design as a contested field. Journal of Urban Design, 25(1), 14-16. [DOI:10.1080/13574809.2019.1706896]
33. Duany, A. (2002). Introduction to the special issue: The transect. Journal of Urban Design, 7(3), 251-260. [DOI:10.1080/1357480022000039321]
34. Ellin, N. (1999). Postmodern urbanism. Princeton Architectural Press.
35. Ellin, N. (2012). Integral urbanism: A context for urban design. Resilience in ecology and urban design: linking theory and practice for sustainable cities, 63-78. [DOI:10.1007/978-94-007-5341-9_4]
36. Ellis, C. (2002). The new urbanism: Critiques and rebuttals. Journal of Urban Design, 7(3), 261-291. [DOI:10.1080/1357480022000039330]
37. Ellis, C. (2015). Landscape urbanism and new urbanism: a view of the debate. Journal of Urban Design, 20(3), 303-307. [DOI:10.1080/13574809.2015.1031003]
38. Ellis, C. (2014). Process and principles in urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 19(1), 47-48. [DOI:10.1080/13574809.2014.854680]
39. Fishman, R. (2012). Cities after the End of Cities.
40. Foroughmand Araabi, H. (2018). Schools and skills of critical thinking for urban design. Journal of urban design, 23(5), 763-779.
41. Foroughmand Araabi, H. (2017). Multiple expectations: assessing the assumed roles of theory in relation to urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 22(5), 658-669. [DOI:10.1080/13574809.2017.1298402]
42. Forsyth, A. (2007). Innovation in urban design: Does research help? Journal of Urban Design, 12(3), 461-473. [DOI:10.1080/13574800701602569]
43. Forsyth, A., & Crewe, K. (2009). New visions for suburbia: Reassessing aesthetics and place-making in modernism, imageability and new urbanism. Journal of urban Design, 14(4), 415-438. [DOI:10.1080/13574800903265470]
44. Goerlich Gisbert, F. J., Cantarino Martí, I., & Gielen, E. (2017). Clustering cities through urban metrics analysis. Journal of Urban Design, 22(5), 689-708. [DOI:10.1080/13574809.2017.1305882]
45. Golkar, K. (2018). Creating Sustainable place: Urban design Theories, Shahid Beheshti University, Third edition. [in Persian]
46. Golkar, K. (1999). Urban Design Definition, Samin Novin Tehran, first Edition. [in Persian]
47. Gosling, D., & Maitland, B. (1984). Concepts of urban design.
48. Gosling, D. (1984). Definitions of urban design. Architectural design, 54(1-2), A16-A25.
49. Heins, M. (2015). Finding common ground between new urbanism and landscape urbanism. Journal of urban design, 20(3), 293-302. [DOI:10.1080/13574809.2015.1031002]
50. Heins, M. (2015). Finding common ground between new urbanism and landscape urbanism. Journal of urban design, 20(3), 293-302. [DOI:10.1080/13574809.2015.1031002]
51. Hillier, J. (2009). Shadows of Power: An Allegory of Prudence in Land-use Planning, Iran Consulting Engineers Society, First Edition. [in Persian]
52. Inam, A. (2011). From dichotomy to dialectic: practising theory in urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 16(2), 257-277
https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2011.552835 [DOI:10.1080/13574809.2020.1857646]
53. Jacobs, J. (1961). Jane jacobs. The Death and Life of Great American Cities, 21(1), 13-25.
54. Krier, R., & Rowe, C. (1979). Urban space (p. 17). London: Academy editions.
55. Kullmann, K. (2015). Grounding landscape urbanism and new urbanism. Journal of Urban Design, 20(3), 311-313. [DOI:10.1080/13574809.2015.1030996]
56. Lang, J. (2006). Urban design: A typology of procedures and products. Routledge.
57. Lang, J. (2014). Comments on 'the place shaping continuum: A theory of urban design processes. Journal of Urban Design, 19(1), 41-43. [DOI:10.1080/13574809.2014.854681]
58. Lang, J. (2020). Programmes and paradigms in urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 25(1), 20-22. [DOI:10.1080/13574809.2019.1706320]
59. Lynch, K. (1981). The Form of the City. Cities and City Planning (pp. 30-60). Springer. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4684-1089-1_4]
60. Madanipour, A. (2008). Design of Urban Space: An Inquiry into a Socio-Spatial Process, Urban Planning and Processing. [in Persian]
61. Madanipour, A. (1996). Design of urban space: An inquiry into a socio-spatial process. Wiley.
62. Madanipour, A. (2006). Roles and challenges of urban design. Journal of urban design, 11(2), 173-193. [DOI:10.1080/13574800600644035]
63. Mapes, J., & Wolch, J. (2011). 'Living green': the promise and pitfalls of new sustainable communities. Journal of Urban Design, 16(1), 105-126. [DOI:10.1080/13574809.2011.521012]
64. Madden, K. (2000). Creating "places" that work. How to turn a place around: A handbook for creating successful public places, New York, NY: Project for Public Spaces.
65. Rowley, A. (1994). Definitions of urban design: The nature and concerns of urban design. Planning Practice and Research, 9(3), 179-197. [DOI:10.1080/02697459408722929]
66. Ryan, B. D. (2015). Hard Urbanism. Journal of Urban Design, 20(3), 321-322. [DOI:10.1080/13574809.2015.1031000]
67. Ryan, B. (2004). Alphaworld: The urban design of a digital city. Journal of Urban Design, 9(3), 287-309. [DOI:10.1080/1357480042000283850]
68. Samalavicius, A. (2013). Revisiting and rethinking contemporary urban design. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 37(3), 161-164. [DOI:10.3846/20297955.2013.820876]
69. Schwarzer, M. (2000). The contemporary city in four movements. Journal of Urban Design, 5(2), 127-144. [DOI:10.1080/713683960]
70. Salingaros, N. A. (2000). Complexity and urban coherence. Journal of urban design, 5(3), 291-316. [DOI:10.1080/713683969]
71. Shadar, H. (2010). Evolution and critical regionalism. Journal of urban design, 15(2), 227-242. [DOI:10.1080/13574801003638137]
72. Sitte, C. (2015). The Art of Building Cities: City Building According to Its Artistic Fundamentals, Tehran University, Third Edition. [in Persian]
73. Sorkin, M. (2013). The End (S) of Urban Design. In The Urban Design Reader, edited by M. Larice and E. Macdonald, 638-654. London: Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9780203094235-59]
74. Steiner, F., & McSherry, L. (2020). Erosion and deposition. Journal of Urban Design, 25(1), 31-34. [DOI:10.1080/13574809.2019.1706901]
75. Talen, E. (2002). Help for urban planning: the transect strategy. Journal of Urban Design, 7(3), 293-312. [DOI:10.1080/1357480022000039349]
76. Trancik, R. (1987). Finding lost space: theories of urban design. John Wiley & Sons.
77. Varna, G., & Tiesdell, S. (2010). Assessing the publicness of public space: The star model of publicness. Journal of Urban Design, 15(4), 575-598. [DOI:10.1080/13574809.2010.502350]
78. Verma, N. (2011). Urban Design: An incompletely theorized project 1. In Companion to urban design (pp. 57-69). Routledge.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
