Volume 9, Issue 1 (Semi-Annual 2024)
CIAUJ 2024, 9(1): 91-108 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Abdizadeh S, Nasiri H, Ahmadnejad F. Evaluation of the Effects of Porch in Traditional Houses of Tabriz on the amount of Daylight Factor Changes
(Case study: Behnam, Ghadaki, Ganjeizadeh houses). CIAUJ 2024; 9 (1) :91-108
URL: http://ciauj-tabriziau.ir/article-1-423-en.html
URL: http://ciauj-tabriziau.ir/article-1-423-en.html
1- Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Tabriz, Iran , so.abdizadeh@tabriziau.ac.ir
2- Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Tabriz, Iran
2- Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Tabriz, Iran
Abstract: (2615 Views)
Daylight factor (DF) is recognized as an important element in architecture and a beneficial strategy in designing energy-efficient buildings. In the meantime, porches one of the influential factors in the amount of daylight received, which can be useful in reducing energy consumption. Daylight has positive physical and psychological effect on users and is one of the main aspects of design; therefore, the present study was conducted with the aim of evaluating the effect of the porches in traditional houses of Tabriz on the changes in the daylight factor. In this regard, Qajar-era architecture was chosen due to its proximity to the present time, the structural characteristic of houses from this period, i.e., having a porch, and a larger statistical population. Thus, the houses of Behnam, Ghadki and Ganjeizadeh in Tabriz were selected as a sample population. In this study, information was collected through library research and field study. Subsequently, the daylight factor level in the spaces behind the porches was evaluated using energy simulation software. Based on the selected index, the performance of porches was examined in different orientations and seasons. The results showed that the influence of porches on daylight factor levels is greater in summer with a reduction of 60-30% compared to a reduction of 1-30% in winter. Considering the results, it is concluded that traditional houses with porches perform more optimally in terms of controlling the lighting conditions in the space than houses without them and the quality of lighting in the spaces behind the porch in these houses in different seasons of the year is much closer to the standard level.
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
the comparative studies of Architecture and Urbanism in the realm of Cultural Iran
Received: 2022/11/5 | Accepted: 2024/01/9 | ePublished: 2024/06/29
Received: 2022/11/5 | Accepted: 2024/01/9 | ePublished: 2024/06/29
References
1. Acosta, I., Navarro, J., & Sendra, J. J. (2013). Predictive method of the sky component in a courtyard under overcast sky conditions. Solar energy, 89, 89-99. [DOI:10.1016/j.solener.2012.12.009]
2. Ahmed, E. B. (2021). Utilizing dynamic shading system to achieve daylight performance according to LEED standards V. 4: case study, university classrooms in Egypt. HBRC Journal, 17(1), 177-200. [DOI:10.1080/16874048.2021.1920138]
3. Antoniou, K., & Aik, M. (2005). Analysis of different forms of classrooms in respect to Daylighting Performance. In Proceedings of PLEA 2005-The 22nd Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture (pp. 93-97).
4. Bagheri, S.M., kordjamshidi, M., & piraste, S. (2016). Evaluation of porches effect in annual energy consumption optimimzation of residential buildings. IJE, 19 (2): 1-12 [In persian].
5. Baker, N., & Steemers, K. (2014). Daylight design of buildings: a handbook for architects and engineers. Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9781315073750]
6. Chel, A., Tiwari, G. N., & Chandra, A. (2009). A model for estimation of daylight factor for skylight: an experimental validation using pyramid shape skylight over vault roof mud-house in New Delhi (India). Applied Energy, 86(11), 2507-2519. [DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.03.004]
7. Chinazzo, G., Wienold, J., & Andersen, M. J. L. R. (2020). Influence of indoor temperature and daylight illuminance on visual perception. Lighting Research & Technology, 52(3), 350-370.. [DOI:10.1177/1477153519859609]
8. Gomes, M. G., Santos, A. J., & Rodrigues, A. M. (2014). Solar and visible optical properties of glazing systems with venetian blinds: Numerical, experimental and blind control study. Building and Environment, 71, 47-59. [DOI:10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.09.003]
9. Guide, C. L. (1999). 10: 1999: Daylighting and Window Design. [DOI:10.1016/S0262-1762(99)90834-9]
10. Heschong, L. (2012). Daylight Metrics: PIER Daylighting Plus Research Program. Final project report for Public Interest Research (PIER) Program.
11. Li, D. H. (2010). A review of daylight illuminance determinations and energy implications. Applied Energy, 87(7), 2109-2118. [DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.03.004]
12. Light, C. E. N. (2011). Lighting-Basic Terms and Criteria for Specifying Lighting Requirements. European Standard EN, 12665.
13. Moazeni, M.H., & Ghiyabaklou, Z. (2016). Simulation of the impact of horizontal canopies on the distribution of daylight and visual comfort. International Congress of Sustainability in Architecture and Urban Planning, 1-11 [In persian].
14. Mohapatra, B. N., Kumar, M. R., Mandal, S. K., & Mohapatra, R. K. (2018). Daylight factor analysis with slat angle control for glare reduction in a three storied office building. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 13(15), 12040-12046.
15. Nabil, A., & Mardaljevic, J. (2005). Useful daylight illuminance: a new paradigm for assessing daylight in buildings. Lighting Research & Technology, 37(1), 41-57. [DOI:10.1191/1365782805li128oa]
16. Nasrollahi, N., & Shokri, E. (2016). Daylight illuminance in urban environments for visual comfort and energy performance. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 66, 861-874. [DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.052]
17. Shafavi Moghaddam, N., Zomorodian, Z. S., & Tahsildoost, M. (2019). Ability of daylight Indicators in estimating adequate lighting in space based on user assessments Case study: Architecture design studios in Tehran. Soffeh, 29(86): 37-56 [In persian]. [DOI:10.29252/soffeh.29.3.37]
18. Suk, J., & Schiler, M. (2013). Investigation of Evalglare software, daylight glare probability and high dynamic range imaging for daylight glare analysis. Lighting Research & Technology, 45(4), 450-463. [DOI:10.1177/1477153512458671]
19. Tabadkani, S., Roetzel, A., Li, H. X., & Tsangrassoulis, A. (2021). Daylight in buildings and visual comfort evaluation: The advantages and limitations.
20. Tsikra, P., & Andreou, E. (2017). Investigation of the energy saving potential in existing school buildings in Greece. The role of shading and daylight strategies in visual comfort and energy saving. Procedia environmental sciences, 38, 204-211. [DOI:10.1016/j.proenv.2017.03.107]
21. Vaisi, S., & Kharvari, F. (2019). Evaluation of Daylight regulations in buildings using daylight factor analysis method by radiance. Energy for Sustainable Development, 49, 100-108. [DOI:10.1016/j.esd.2019.02.002]
22. Zomorodian, Z. S., & Tahsildoost, M. (2019). Assessing the effectiveness of dynamic metrics in predicting daylight availability and visual comfort in classrooms. Renewable energy, 134, 669-680. [DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2018.11.072]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
