Volume 8, Issue 2 (Semi-Annual 2023)
CIAUJ 2023, 8(2): 53-80 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Ardiani M, Tahoori N, Shahcheraghi A. A Comparative Study of the Formative Elements and Components of the Mosque by Focusing on the Opinions of Henri Stierlin and Oleg Grabar. CIAUJ 2023; 8 (2) :53-80
URL: http://ciauj-tabriziau.ir/article-1-486-en.html
URL: http://ciauj-tabriziau.ir/article-1-486-en.html
1- Department of Architecture, Science and research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Art, Science and research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran ,n-tahoori@srbiau.ac.ir
3- Department of Architecture, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Art, Science and research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran ,
3- Department of Architecture, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (1058 Views)
The study and examination of Islamic architecture through different intellectual approaches, such as traditionalism, historicism, and phenomenology, highlight the subject's importance in Western researchers' works. Each of these intellectual approaches seeks to present the results of their studies on Islamic architecture from its particular perspective. What definitions of Islamic architecture have been provided by each of these methods, and how does the difference in their interpretative approach contribute to understanding Islamic architecture? The present study aims to show what definition of Islamic architecture has been presented by each of these two perspectives and what are the differences and commonalities between them through a comparative study of views based on phenomenology (HenriStierlin) and historicism (Oleg Grabar). It takes on the assumption that each of the two researchers presents a different definition of the relationship between Islam and architecture. The research findings indicate that from Grabar's point of view, Islamic architecture has no connection with the religion of Islam, and the relationship between Islam and architecture cannot convey any particular meaning in terms of religion. While Stierlin considers Islamic architecture to be derived from the essence of the religion of Islam. The present study employs a descriptive-analytical method and a comparative approach to study the elements and components that shape the mosque from the phenomenological perspective of HenriStierlin and the historicism of Oleg Grabar
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
the comparative studies of Architecture and Urbanism in the realm of Cultural Iran
Received: 2023/06/21 | Accepted: 2023/11/21 | ePublished: 2023/12/29
Received: 2023/06/21 | Accepted: 2023/11/21 | ePublished: 2023/12/29
References
1. Bordbari, F. (2012). Symbolism in Islamic art from the point of view of Titus Burkhardt. (Master's thesis in the field of art research). University of Sistan and Baluchistan. [In Persian]
2. Corbin, H. (1962). History of Islamic philosophy. (Liadin Sherrard & Philip Sherrard, Trans.). London: The Institute of Ismaili Studies. (Original work published 1960)
3. (1997). Alone with the alone: creative imagination in the Sufism of Ibn Arabi. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
4. (2007). Nasir-I Khusrau and Iranian Ismailism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Dickie, J. (2000). Fom architecture of the Islamic world. London: Thames & Hudson.
6. El-Dessouki, O. (2000). Translation of Islamic Culture into Arabian architecture. (Master's thesis in the field of architecture). Curtin University of technology, Perth, Australia.
7. Emami Kopaei, S., Norouz Brazjani, V., & Safian, M. J. (2018). Phenomenology: A Methodology for Understanding Traditional Architecture. Baghe Nazar. 15(65): 13-24. [In Persian]
8. Emami, F. (2021). The religious architecture of Islam. Belgium: Brepols publishers.
9. Grabar, O. (1983). Reflections on the study of Islamic art. Muqarnas 1(1): 1-14. [DOI:10.2307/1523068]
10. (1992). the Mediation of Ornament. Princeton: Princeton university press.
11. (2006). Islamic art and beyond, constructing the study of Islamic art. Farnham: Ashgate publishing company.
12. (2007). Symbols and Signs in Islamic Architecture. (Nayer Tahoori, Trans.). Golestan Honar. 3(9): 13-25. [In Persian]
13. (2009). Great Mosque of Isfahan. (Mohammad Ali Mousavi Fereidouni, Trans.). Isfahan: Mani publishing. (Original work published 1990). [In Persian]
14. (2017). the formation of Islamic art. (Mehdi Golchin Arefi, Trans.). Tehran: Hekmat Sina publishing. (Original work published 1973). [In Persian]
15. Hauser, A. (2021). Philosophy of art history. (Mohammad Taghi Faramarzi, Trans.). Tehran: negah publishing. (Original work published 1959). [In Persian]
16. Hojjat, I. (2015). Traditionalists and Architectural Traditionalism. HONAR-HA-YE-ZIBA Memari -va- shahrsazi. 20(1): 5-16. [In Persian]
17. Imani, N. (2004). Architecture and Islam. (PhD dissertation in Architecture). Faculty of Fine Arts, University of Tehran. [In Persian]
18. (2005). Criticism of historians' perception of Islamic architecture. Golestan Honar. 1(1): 74-80. [In Persian]
19. Mortazavi, S. R. (2017). Review and criticism of Henry Carbin's religious phenomenology approach. Journal of Religious Thought of Shiraz University. 17(2): 121-142. [In Persian]
20. Mousavi Gilani, S. R. (2015). Methodology of Islamic Art. Qabasat. 20(78): 85-114. [In Persian]
21. Pazouki, S. (2004). Historiography and its Relationship with the Theoretical Foundations of Art History. Khiyal. 3(10): 4-13. [In Persian]
22. Piravi Vanak, M. (2016). Introducing criteria for comparative research based on Kerry Walk's point of view. Quarterly Journal of Comparative Art Studies. 6(11): 1-10. [In Persian]
23. Qayyoomi Bidhendi, M. (2004). Oleg Grabar: His Thoughts and Work. Daneshnameh. 2(3): 69-135. [In Persian]
24. Nasiri Hamed, R. (2022). Refusal of politics in Henry Carbon's intellectual project. Scientific Quarterly of Political and International Approaches. 13(3): 137-161. [In Persian]
25. Schimmel, A. (2018). Deciphering the Signs of God: A Phenomenological Approach to Islam. (Abdul Rahim govahi, Trans.). Tehran: Farhang Islamic Publishing office. (Original work published 1994). [In Persian]
26. Stierlin, H. (1971). Iran of the master builders. Geneva: Editions Sigma.
27. (1996). Architectural art in the Safavid era. (Mansour Fallah Nejad, Trans.). Journal of art. 15(30): 169-187. (Original work published 1981) [In Persian]
28. (1998). Isfahan: image of paradise. (Jamshid Arjmand, Trans.). Tehran: Farzan Rooz. (Original work published 1976). [In Persian]
29. (2007). Maya architecture. (Alireza Placid, Trans.). Tehran: Farhangestane Honar. (Original work published 2001). [In Persian]
30. (2009). collection of articles on architecture and urban planning. Interpretation of the Shiite symbols of Imam Mosque in Isfahan with the help of the writings of the mystic cleric, Sohrvardi. Academy of Art: 61-67. [In Persian]
31. (2017). Architecture of the Islamic world from Baghdad to Cordoba (from the 7th to the 13th century AD). (Narges Soleimani, Trans.). Tehran: Farhooshe. (Original work published 2009). [In Persian]
32. (2020). Islamic art and architecture. (Gholamhossein Ali Mazandarani, Trans.). Tehran: Yazda. (Original work published 2002). [In Persian]
33. Tahoori, Nayer. (2007). Criticism on the views of historians of Islamic art and architecture. Golestan Honar. 3(7): 13-32. [In Persian]
34. (2012). Kingdom of Mirrors: A Collection of Articles on the Wisdom of Islamic Art. Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publications. [In Persian]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
