مراتب معرفتی تاریخ فرهنگی و کاربست آن در تاریخ‌نگاری معماری - فرهنگ معماری و شهرسازی اسلامی
دوره 11، شماره 1 - ( دوفصلنامه 1405 )                   جلد 11 شماره 1 صفحات 306-285 | برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها

XML English Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Sabet Eghlidi M, Nejad Ebrahimi A, Medghalchi L. (2026). Epistemic levels of cultural history and its Application in architectural history. , CIAUJ. 11(1), 285-306. doi:10.66224/ciauj.11.1.554
URL: http://ciauj-tabriziau.ir/article-1-554-fa.html
ثابت اقلیدی مرضیه، نژاد ابراهیمی احد، مدقالچی لیلا.(1405). مراتب معرفتی تاریخ فرهنگی و کاربست آن در تاریخ‌نگاری معماری , فرهنگ معماری و شهرسازی اسلامی. 11 (1) :306-285 10.66224/ciauj.11.1.554

URL: http://ciauj-tabriziau.ir/article-1-554-fa.html

مراتب معرفتی تاریخ فرهنگی و کاربست آن در تاریخ‌نگاری معماری
مرضیه ثابت اقلیدی1 ، احد نژاد ابراهیمی*2 ، لیلا مدقالچی1
1- گروه معماری اسلامی، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه هنر اسلامی تبریز، تبریز، ایران
2- گروه معماری اسلامی، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه هنر اسلامی تبریز، تبریز، ایران ، ahadebrahimi@tabriziau.ac.ir
چکیده:   (1116 مشاهده)
تاریخ فرهنگی به عنوان نوعی تاریخ، دارای مفروضاتی است که برخی انتزاعی‌تر و عام‌‌تر و برخی عینی‌تر و جزئی‌تر هستند؛ درواقع این پیش‌فرض‌ها به مراتب مختلفی از معرفت تعلق دارند. اختلاط میان این سطوح می‌تواند استفاده از تاریخ فرهنگی در حوزه‌های دیگر همچون تاریخ معماری را دچار آشفتگی کند. از این رو پژوهش حاضر می‌کوشد در وهلۀ اول مراتب معرفتی تاریخ فرهنگی را تبیین کند و در وهلۀ دوم الزامات هر مرتبه را برای کاربستِ تاریخ فرهنگی در تاریخ معماری روشن کند. بنابراین مطالعۀ حاضر بدنبال پاسخ به دو پرسش است: 1- مفروضات تاریخ فرهنگی در هر مرتبۀ معرفتی چیست؟ 2- الزامات این مفروضات در نگارش یک تاریخ فرهنگی معماری چیست؟ روش تحقیق، استدلال منطقی از نوع سامانه‌ای-گفتمانی و روش گردآوری اطلاعات کتابخانه‌ای است. براساس مطالعات صورت گرفته، تاریخ فرهنگی در مرتبۀ فلسفه، متعلق به فلسفۀ تحلیلی تاریخ بوده و با نفی فلسفی هگل همراه است؛ در مرتبۀ پارادایم، انتقادی است و در سطح نظریه باید مبتنی بر نظریه‌های فرهنگی و انتقادی پیش رود.
واژه‌های کلیدی: تاریخ فرهنگی، تاریخ معماری، مراتب معرفتی، فلسفۀ تاریخ، پارادایم تاریخ‌نگاری، نظریه و تاریخ
متن کامل [PDF 1276 kb]   (308 دریافت)    
نوع مطالعه: پژوهشي | موضوع مقاله: مفهوم سازي نظريه پردازي در معماری و شهرسازی اسلامی
دریافت: 1403/2/11 | پذیرش: 1404/9/5 | انتشار الکترونیک: 1405/4/7
فهرست منابع
1. Ahmadi, H. (2019). Cultural history: Epistemology and methodology (1st ed.). Tehran: Islamic Research Institute for Culture and Thought Publications [in Persian].
2. Ahmadzadeh, M. A. (2020). An introduction to the methodology and fields of cultural history studies (Collection of articles, Vol. 1). Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies [in Persian].
3. Alici, A., Oztürk, O., Yayinlari, D., Manai, A., Dorn, J., & Mullins, J. (2016). A critique of Hegel's philosophy of history. In III. International History Conference Proceedings. Istanbul: DAKAM (Eastern Mediterranean Academic Research Center).
4. Arcangeli, A. (2012). Cultural history: A concise introduction. London: Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9780203789247]
5. Architectural Research Methods (2nd ed.). Wiley.
6. Ardalan, K. (2018). Case Method and Pluralist Economics: Philosophy, Methodology and Practice (1st ed.). Springer Cham. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-72071-5]
7. Atkinson, R. F. (2019). The philosophy of history. (H. A. Nowzari, Trans.). In H. A. Nowzari, Philosophy of history, methodology, and historiography (pp. 23-68). Tehran: Tarh-e No. (Original work published 1998) [in Persian]
8. Bachelard, G. (1988). Air and dreams: An essay on the imagination of movement (E. R. Farrell & C. F. Farrell, Trans.). Dallas: Dallas Institute of Humanities and Culture. (Original work published 1943)
9. Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Rabelais and his world (H. Iswolsky, Trans.). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. (Original work published 1968)
10. Bhaskar, R. (1979). The possibility of naturalism: A philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences. Brighton: Harvester.
11. Blaikie, N. (2021). Research paradigms in the humanities. Translated by S. H. Hassani, M. T. Iman, and M. Majed. Tehran: Research Institute of Hawzah and University. (Original work published in 1993) [in Persian].
12. Borden, I., & Rendell, J. (2000). From chamber to transformer: Epistemological challenges in the methodology of theorized architectural history. The Journal of Architecture, 5(2), 215-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/136023600408719 [DOI:10.1080/136023600373264]
13. Bozdoğan, S., & Necipoğlu, G. (2007). Entangled discourses: Scrutinizing Orientalist and nationalist legacies in the architectural historiography of the lands of Rum. Muqarnas Online, 24(1), 1-6. [DOI:10.1163/22118993-90000108]
14. Burke, P. (2010a). What is cultural history? (N. Fazeli & M. Ghelich, Trans.). Tehran: Research Center for Islamic History. (Original work published 2005) [in Persian]
15. Burke, P. (2010b). Cultural history as polyphonic history. Arbor, 186(743), 479-486. [DOI:10.3989/arbor.2010.743n1212]
16. Burke, P. (2012a). Cultural history and its neighbors. Culture & History Digital Journal, 1(1). [DOI:10.3989/chdj.2012.001]
17. Burke, P. (2012b). Strengths and weaknesses of cultural history. Cultural History, 1(1), 1-13. [DOI:10.3366/cult.2012.0003]
18. Burke, P. (2019). History and social theory. (H. A. Nowzari, Trans.). In H. A. Nowzari, Philosophy of history, methodology, and historiography (pp. 43-408). Tehran: Tarh-e No. (Original work published 1992) [in Persian]
19. Chang, B. (2013). Voice of the voiceless? Multiethnic student voices in critical approaches to race, pedagogy, literacy, and agency. Linguistics and Education, 24(3), 348-360. [DOI:10.1016/j.linged.2013.03.005]
20. Chartier, R. (1986). Images. In A. Burguière (Ed.), Dictionnaire des sciences historiques (pp. 345-347). Paris: PUF.
21. Chartier, R. (2019). On the relation of philosophy and history. (H. A. Nowzari, Trans.). In H. A. Nowzari, Philosophy of history, methodology, and historiography (pp. 369-407). Tehran: Tarh-e No. (Original work published 1997) [in Persian]
22. Chartier, Roger. (2019). on the relation of philosophy and history. (hossein ali nowzari, trans). In R. Chartier, cultural history: between practices and representation, en tr by Lida g. cochrane. Tehran. Tarh e no [in Persian].
23. Chitnis, K. N. (2021). Research methodology in history. Atlantic Publishers and Distributors.
24. Claus, P., & Marriott, J. (2023). History: An introduction to theory and method. London: Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9781003156086]
25. Crotty, M. (1998). Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and perspective in the research process (1st ed.). Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9781003115700]
26. De Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
27. DeCuir, J. T., & Dixson, A. D. (2004). So, when it comes out, they aren't that surprised that it is there: Using critical race theory as a tool of analysis of race and racism in education. Educational Researcher, 33(5), 26-31. [DOI:10.3102/0013189X033005026]
28. Fazeli, N. (2007). Viewpoint: The ups and downs of cultural historiography. Ketabmah-e Tarikh va Joghrafiya, 110, 26-35. [in Persian]
29. Fazeli, N. (2014). Cultural history of modern Iran. Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. [in Persian]
30. Groat, L. N., & Wang, D. (2013). Architectural Research Methods (2nd ed.). Wiley.
31. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117). London: Sage.
32. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 191-215). London: Sage.
33. Gunn, S. (2014). History and cultural theory. Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9781315835532]
34. Harkness, A. R. (2012). Personality traits are essential for a complete clinical science. In The great ideas of clinical science (pp. 293-320). London: Routledge.
35. Hillix, W. A., & L'Abate, L. (2011). The role of paradigms in science and theory construction. In Paradigms in theory construction (pp. 3-17). New York, NY: Springer New York. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4614-0914-4_1]
36. Hobsbawm, E. J., & Ranger, T. (Eds.). (1983). *The invention of tradition*. Cambridge University Press.
37. Iggers, G. G. (2019). Historiography in the twentieth century: From scientific objectivity to the postmodern challenge (M. E. Baset, Trans.). Tehran: SAMT. (Original work published 1997) [in Persian]
38. Iman, M. T. (2020). Philosophy of research methods in the humanities. Edited by A. Kalateh Sadati. Tehran: Research Institute of Hawzah and University [in Persian].
39. Jenkins, Keith (1991). Re-thinking history. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203426869_chapter_2 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203426869_INTRODUCTION https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203426869_chapter_1 [DOI:10.4324/9780203426869_chapter_3]
40. Kaiser, D. (2020). The paradigm in the philosophy of science. In Economic theory in the 21st century: Towards a renewed understanding of money and capital from a system-wide perspective (pp. 3-4). Springer. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-658-30639-7_1]
41. Kincaid, H. (2009). Philosophies of historiography and the social sciences. In A. Tucker (Ed.), The Routledge Companion to the philosophy of history (pp. 297-307). Routledge. [DOI:10.1002/9781444304916.ch26]
42. Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226458106.001.0001]
43. Lai, W. L. (2017). The secret of building a logical argument. NU Ideas, 6, 1-10.
44. Leitgeb, H. (2011). Logic in general philosophy of science: Old things and new things. Synthese, 179(2), 339-350. [DOI:10.1007/s11229-010-9776-5]
45. Lowry, R. S. (2009). American studies, cultural history, and the critique of culture. The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era, 8(3), 301-339. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537781400001298 [DOI:10.1017/S1537781400001126]
46. Marcos, F. S. (2020). Historiography of the 20th and 21st centuries. Translated by Dustin, L. Retrieved from https://culturahistorica.org/
47. Miles, S. (1998). Consumerism: As a way of life. Sage. [DOI:10.4135/9781446217115]
48. Minkov, M., & Kaasa, A. (2021). A test of the revised Minkov-Hofstede model of culture: Mirror images of subjective and objective culture across nations and the 50 US states. Cross-Cultural Research, 55(2-3), 230-281. https://doi.org/10.1177/10693971211014468 [DOI:10.1177/10693971211012903]
49. Mirjani, H. (2010). Logical argumentation as a research method. Soffeh, 20(1-2), 35-50. [in Persian]
50. Moore, A. (2016). Historicizing historical theory's history of cultural historiography. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 12(1), 257-291.
51. Necipoğlu, G. (2012). The concept of Islamic art: Inherited discourses and new approaches. Journal of Art Historiography, 6, 1-34.
52. Neuman, W. L. (2006). Social research methods: Quantitative and qualitative approaches (6th ed.). London: Allyn and Bacon. https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-0957-K07-31 [DOI:10.1557/PROC-0957-K05-03]
53. Nowzari, H. A. (2019). Philosophy of history, methodology, and historiography. Tehran: Tarh-e No. [in Persian]
54. Panofsky, E. (1955). Meaning in the visual arts. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
55. Poster, M. (2019). A new kind of history. (H. A. Nowzari, Trans.). In H. A. Nowzari, Philosophy of history, methodology, and historiography (pp. 408-443). Tehran: Tarh-e No. (Original work published 1990) [in Persian]
56. Ricoeur, P. (1965). History and truth. Northwestern University Press.
57. Ricoeur, P. (1984). Time and narrative (Vol. 3). University of Chicago Press. [DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226713519.001.0001]
58. Rodman, G. B. (2013). Cultural studies and history. In The Sage handbook of historical theory (pp. 342-353). Sage. [DOI:10.4135/9781446247563.n21]
59. Sagi, G. (2021). Logic as a methodological discipline. Synthese, 199, 9725-9749. [DOI:10.1007/s11229-021-03235-z]
60. Said, E. (2011). Orientalism (L. A. Khanji, Trans.). Tehran: Amir Kabir. (Original work published 1978) [in Persian]
61. Sandercock, L. (1998). Framing insurgent historiographies for planning. In Making the invisible visible: A multicultural planning history (pp. 1-33). University of California Press. [DOI:10.1525/9780520918573-003]
62. Scott, J. W. (1988). Gender and the politics of history. Columbia University Press. [DOI:10.7312/scot91266]
63. Scott, J. W. (1999). Some reflections on gender and politics. In M. M. Ferree, J. Lorber, & B. B. Hess (Eds.), Revisioning gender (pp. 70-96). Sage.
64. Shahidi Marnani, N., & Qayyoomi Bidhendi, M. (2013). Cultural historical approach and its feasibility and benefits in the study of the architecture of Iran. Cultural History Studies, 5(17), 87-107. [in Persian]
65. Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture (pp. 271-313). University of Illinois Press.
66. Stanford, M. (2019). Introduction to philosophy of history. (H. A. Nowzari, Trans.). In H. A. Nowzari, Philosophy of history, methodology, and historiography (pp. 69-107). Tehran: Tarh-e No. (Original work published 1998) [in Persian]
67. Stryker, R. (1996). Beyond history versus theory. Sociological Methods & Research, 24(3), 304-352. [DOI:10.1177/0049124196024003002]
68. Swaffield, S., & Deming, M. E. (2011). Research strategies in landscape architecture: Mapping the terrain. Journal of Landscape Architecture, 6(1), 34-45. [DOI:10.1080/18626033.2011.9723453]
69. Thompson, J. B. (1989). The theory of structuration. In D. Held & J. B. Thompson (Eds.), Social theory of modern societies: Anthony Giddens and his critics (pp. 56-76). Cambridge University Press. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511557699.004]
70. Threadgold, T. (2003). Cultural studies, critical theory, and critical discourse analysis: Histories, remembering, and futures. Linguistik Online, 14(2). [DOI:10.13092/lo.14.821]
71. White, H. (1973). Metahistory: The historical imagination in nineteenth-century Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
72. Wickberg, D. (2005). Heterosexual white male: Some recent inversions in American cultural history. The Journal of American History, 92(1), 136-157. https://doi.org/10.2307/3660527 [DOI:10.2307/3660527.]
ارسال پیام به نویسنده مسئول

بازنشر اطلاعات
Creative Commons License این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است.

کلیه حقوق این وب سایت متعلق به فرهنگ معماری و شهرسازی اسلامی می باشد.

طراحی و برنامه نویسی : یکتاوب افزار شرق

© 2026 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Culture of Islamic Architecture and Urbanism Journal

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb