دوره 11، شماره 1 - ( دوفصلنامه 1405 )
جلد 11 شماره 1 صفحات 146-115 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Monadi A. (2026). Structural analysis of the role of cultural ecosystem services in tourists' perception of the recreational space of El-Goli, Tabriz, and its impact on their psychological and physical well-being. , CIAUJ. 11(1), 115-146. doi:10.66224/ciauj.11.1.661
URL: http://ciauj-tabriziau.ir/article-1-661-fa.html
URL: http://ciauj-tabriziau.ir/article-1-661-fa.html
منادی عارف.(1405). تحلیل ساختاری نقش خدمات فرهنگی اکوسیستم در درک گردشگران از فضای تفریحی ائل‌گلی تبریز و تأثیر آن بر بهزیستی روانی و فیزیکی آنها , فرهنگ معماری و شهرسازی اسلامی. 11 (1) :146-115 10.66224/ciauj.11.1.661
گروه مهندسی شهرسازی، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه بین المللی سوره، تهران، ایران ، aref_monadi@soore.ac.ir
چکیده: (1126 مشاهده)
گردشگری نقش بسیار مهمی در اقتصاد جهانی ایفا می‌کند و در رشد اقتصادی، تبادلات فرهنگی، حفظ محیط زیست و ارتقای رفاه گردشگران سهم قابل توجهی دارد. مواجهه گردشگران با خدمات اکوسیستمی فرهنگی (CES) در طول فعالیت‌های گردشگری می‌تواند تأثیر قابل توجهی بر رفاه آنها داشته باشد. بنابراین، شناخت رابطه میان خدمات اکوسیستمی فرهنگی و رفاه گردشگران برای تحقق توسعه پایدار گردشگری امری ضروری است. این پژوهش به تحلیل خدمات اکوسیستمی فرهنگی درک‌شده توسط گردشگران و بررسی تأثیر آن بر رفاه آنان در پارک ائل‌گلی تبریز می‌پردازد. نتایج به‌دست‌آمده نشان می‌دهد که خدمات اکوسیستمی فرهنگی تأثیرات مثبت و متنوعی بر جنبه‌های مختلف رفاه گردشگران دارد. به ویژه، دسته‌هایی مانند تفریح و بوم‌گردی، ارزش‌های زیبایی‌شناختی و روابط اجتماعی بیشترین نقش را در ارتقای رفاه بازدیدکنندگان این پارک ایفا کرده‌اند. گنجاندن ملاحظات مرتبط با رفاه گردشگران در فرآیندهای برنامه‌ریزی و تصمیم‌سازی حوزه گردشگری، می‌تواند نقش مؤثری در هدایت توسعه گردشگری به سمت بهبود کیفیت زندگی گردشگران و تضمین پایداری این صنعت ایفا کند.
نوع مطالعه: پژوهشي |
موضوع مقاله:
شناسايي شكل زندگي مبتني بر سه مولفه کالبد، سبک زندگی و مفاهیم - معانی
دریافت: 1404/6/19 | پذیرش: 1404/11/5 | انتشار الکترونیک: 1405/4/7
دریافت: 1404/6/19 | پذیرش: 1404/11/5 | انتشار الکترونیک: 1405/4/7
فهرست منابع
1. Aburumman, O. J., Omar, K., Al Shbail, M., & Aldoghan, M. (2022, March). How to Deal with the Results of PLS-SEM. In International Conference on Business and Technology (pp. 1196-1206). Cham: Springer International Publishing. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-031-08954-1_101]
2. Baloch, Q. B., Shah, S. N., Iqbal, N., Sheeraz, M., Asadullah, M., Mahar, S., & Khan, A. U. (2023). Impact of tourism development upon environmental sustainability: a suggested framework for sustainable ecotourism. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(3), 5917-5930. [DOI:10.1007/s11356-022-22496-w]
3. Breuste, J. (2020). "The benefit concept--How people can benefit from urban nature Breuste, J. Artmann, M., Ioja, C., Qureshi, S." In Making Green Cities:Concepts, Challenges and Practice (Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland AG 49-73). [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-73089-5_3]
4. Buckley, R. (2020). Nature tourism and mental health: Parks, happiness, and causation. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 28(9), 1409-1424. [DOI:10.1080/09669582.2020.1742725]
5. Bullock, C., Joyce, D., & Collier, M. (2018). An exploration of the relationships between cultural ecosystem services, socio-cultural values, and well-being. Ecosystem services, 31, 142-152. [DOI:10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.020]
6. Cai, Z., Fang, C., Zhang, Q., & Chen, F. (2021). Joint development of cultural heritage protection and tourism: the case of Mount Lushan cultural landscape heritage site. Heritage Science, 9(1), 86.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-021-00558-5 [DOI:10.1186/s40494-021-00613-1]
8. Chen, H., & Rahman, I. (2018). Cultural tourism: An analysis of engagement, cultural contact, memorable tourism experience and destination loyalty. Tourism management perspectives, 26, 153-163. [DOI:10.1016/j.tmp.2017.10.006]
9. Chen, X., & Li, J. (2023). Facilitating knowledge-driven economic and social development: The significance of demographic transformation in tourism villages in China. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1-29. [DOI:10.1007/s13132-023-01676-0]
10. Cheng, Z., & Chen, X. (2022). The effect of tourism experience on tourists' environmentally responsible behavior at cultural heritage sites: The mediating role of cultural attachment. Sustainability, 14(1), 565. [DOI:10.3390/su14010565]
11. Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research, 295(2), 295-336. ISBN:9781410604385
12. Clissold, R., Westoby, R., McNamara, K. E., & Fleming, C. (2022). Wellbeing outcomes of nature tourism: Mt Barney Lodge. Annals of Tourism Research Empirical Insights, 3(2), 100077. [DOI:10.1016/j.annale.2022.100077]
13. Coscieme, L. (2015). Cultural ecosystem services: The inspirational value of ecosystems in popular music. Ecosystem Services, 16, 121-124. [DOI:10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.024]
14. Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Braat, L., Kubiszewski, I., Fioramonti, L., Sutton, P., Farber, S., Grasso, M. (2017). Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosyst. Serv. 28, 1-16. [DOI:10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008]
15. Dai, P., Zhang, S., Chen, Z., Gong, Y., & Hou, H. (2019). Perceptions of cultural ecosystem services in urban parks based on social network data. Sustainability, 11(19), 5386. [DOI:10.3390/su11195386]
16. de Freitas Coelho, M., de Sevilha Gosling, M., & de Almeida, A. S. A. (2018). Tourism experiences: Core processes of memorable trips. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 37, 11-22. [DOI:10.1016/j.jhtm.2018.08.004]
17. Dur'an Vian, F., Pons Izquierdo, J.J., Serrano Martínez, M. (2021). River-city recreational interaction: A classification of urban riverfront parks and walks. Urban For. Urban Green. 59, 127042
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127042 [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127042]
18. Edelheim, J. (2020). How should tourism education values be transformed after 2020?. Tourism Geographies, 22(3), 547-554. [DOI:10.1080/14616688.2020.1760927]
19. Farshad, L., Zaghez, A., & Mehrdanesh, G. (2021). Assessing the quality of urban furniture and its role in the development of urban tourism (Case study: Zaribar Lake). Journal of Urban Development and Architecture-Environment Identity (JUDA-EI), 2(5), 36-48. doi: 10.22034/(jrupa-ei).2021.283661.1075
20. Ferguson, M. D., Robinson, T., Ferguson, L. A., Evensen, D., Schwartz, F., Gonyo, S., & Freitag, A. (2024). Cultivating commitment: how cultural ecosystem services affect visitor loyalty attitudes and intention-to-return in parks and protected areas. Ecosystems and People, 20(1), 2297560. [DOI:10.1080/26395916.2023.2297560]
21. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50. [DOI:10.1177/002224378101800104]
22. Gabor, M. R., & Oltean, F. D. (2019). Babymoon tourism between emotional well-being service for medical tourism and niche tourism. Development and awareness on Romanian educated women. Tourism Management, 70, 170-175. [DOI:10.1016/j.tourman.2018.08.006]
23. Gai, S., Fu, J., Rong, X., & Dai, L. (2022). Users' views on cultural ecosystem services of urban parks: An importance-performance analysis of a case in Beijing, China. Anthropocene, 37, 100323. [DOI:10.1016/j.ancene.2022.100323]
24. Gao, J., Kerstetter, D. L., Mowen, A. J., & Hickerson, B. (2018). Changes in tourists' perception of well-being based on their use of emotion regulation strategies during vacation. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 35(5), 567-582. [DOI:10.1080/10548408.2017.1374908]
25. Gehl, J. (2011). Life between buildings: Using public space. Island press. [DOI:10.2307/jj.41003936]
26. Gordon, J. E. (2018). Geoheritage, geotourism and the cultural landscape: Enhancing the visitor experience and promoting geoconservation. Geosciences, 8(4), 136. [DOI:10.3390/geosciences8040136]
27. Grzyb, T. (2024). Mapping cultural ecosystem services of the urban riverscapes: the case of the Vistula River in Warsaw, Poland. Ecosystem Services, 65, 101584. [DOI:10.1016/j.ecoser.2023.101584]
28. Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., Ray, S., ... & Ray, S. (2021). An introduction to structural equation modeling. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: a workbook, 1-29. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7_1]
29. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152. [DOI:10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202]
30. Hartwell, H., Fyall, A., Willis, C., Page, S., Ladkin, A., & Hemingway, A. (2018). Progress in tourism and destination wellbeing research. Current issues in Tourism, 21(16), 1830-1892. [DOI:10.1080/13683500.2016.1223609]
31. Hegetschweiler, K. T., de Vries, S., Arnberger, A., Bell, S., Brennan, M., Siter, N., ... & Hunziker, M. (2017). Linking demand and supply factors in identifying cultural ecosystem services of urban green infrastructures: A review of European studies. Urban forestry & urban greening, 21, 48-59. [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2016.11.002]
32. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In New challenges to international marketing (Vol. 20, pp. 277-319). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. doi: 10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014 [DOI:10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014]
33. Heshmati, M., Gheitury, M., & Shadfar, S. (2022). Factors affecting possibility of ecotourism development and sustaining natural resources using SWOT approach in west Iran. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 10(2), 173-183. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijgeop.2022.03.004]
34. Jepson, D., & Sharpley, R. (2018). More than sense of place? Exploring the emotional dimension of rural tourism experiences. In Rural Tourism (pp. 25-46). Routledge. [DOI:10.1080/09669582.2014.953543]
35. Kalinauskas, M., Bogdzevič, K., Gomes, E., Inácio, M., Barcelo, D., Zhao, W., & Pereira, P. (2023). Mapping and assessment of recreational cultural ecosystem services supply and demand in Vilnius (Lithuania). Science of the Total Environment, 855, 158590. [DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158590]
36. Khani, S., Rastkhadiv, A., & Abdollahi, A. (2023). Vandalism in Urban Parks; An analysis on demographic characteristics and the intention and behavior of Vandals in Marivan City. Journal of Social Problems of Iran, 14(2), 165-200. Doi: 10.61186/jspi.14.2.165 [DOI:10.61186/jspi.14.2.165]
37. Kicic, M., Haase, D., Marin, A.M., Vuleti'c, D., Krajter Ostoi'c, S., (2022). Perceptions of cultural ecosystem services of tree-based green infrastructure: A focus group participatory mapping in Zagreb, Croatia. Urban For. Urban Green. 78, 127767. [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127767]
38. Kil, N., Stein, T. V., Holland, S. M., Kim, J. J., Kim, J., & Petitte, S. (2021). The role of place attachment in recreation experience and outcome preferences among forest bathers. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 35, 100410. [DOI:10.1016/j.jort.2021.100410]
39. Kim, B., & Kim, S. S. (2019). The effect of religious tourism experiences on personal values. International Journal of Religious Tourism and Pilgrimage, 7(2), 9. [DOI:10.21427/5gvy-hh90]
40. Kim, J. J., & Han, H. (2022). Redefining in-room amenities for hotel staycationers in the new era of tourism: A deep dive into guest well-being and intentions. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 102, 103168. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103168]
41. Kim, J. J., & Han, H. (2022). Saving the hotel industry: Strategic response to the COVID-19 pandemic, hotel selection, and wellness. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 63(3), 339-358.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103163 [DOI:10.1177/1938965520981071]
42. Kirschkamp, A. (2008). A Contingency-Based View of Chief Executive Officers' Early Warning Behavior. Gabler edition Wissenschaft. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-8350-5504-9]
43. Knobloch, U., Robertson, K., & Aitken, R. (2017). Experience, emotion, and eudaimonia: A consideration of tourist experiences and well-being. Journal of Travel Research, 56(5), 651-662. [DOI:10.1177/0047287516650937]
44. Kohsaka, R., & Rogel, M. (2021). Traditional and local knowledge for sustainable development: Empowering the indigenous and local communities of the world. In Partnerships for the Goals (pp. 1261-1273). Cham: Springer International Publishing. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-95963-4_17]
45. Layke, C. (2009). Measuring nature's benefits: a preliminary roadmap for improving ecosystem service indicators. World Resources Institute: Washington, 1-36.
46. Li, F., Guo, S., Li, D., Li, X., Li, J., & Xie, S. (2020). A multi-criteria spatial approach for mapping urban ecosystem services demand. Ecological Indicators, 112. [DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106119]
47. Li, W. Z., & Zhong, H. (2022). Development of a smart tourism integration model to preserve the cultural heritage of ancient villages in Northern Guangxi. Heritage Science, 10(1), 91. [DOI:10.1186/s40494-022-00724-3]
48. Liu, Z.H., Huang, Q.D., Yang, H.Y., (2021). Supply-demand spatial patterns of park cultural services in megalopolis area of Shenzhen, China. Ecol. Ind. 121. [DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107066]
49. Lonardi, S., & Unterpertinger, Y. (2022). The relevance of intangible cultural heritage and traditional languages for the tourism experience: The case of Ladin in South Tyrol. Sustainability, 14(5), 2729. [DOI:10.3390/su14052729]
50. Lonardi, S., & Unterpertinger, Y. (2022). The role of cultural heritage in promoting social inclusion and well-being. Sustainability, 14(3), 1-18. [DOI:10.3390/su14031524]
51. Magni, G. (2017). Indigenous knowledge and implications for the sustainable development agenda. European Journal of Education, 52(4), 437-447. [DOI:10.1111/ejed.12238]
52. Mao, Q., Hu, C., Guo, Q., Li, Y., & Liu, M. (2023). How Does Vegetation Landscape Structure of Urban Green Spaces Affect Cultural Ecosystem Services at Multiscale: Based on PLS-SEM Model. Forests, 14(7), 1401. [DOI:10.3390/f14071401]
53. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). (2003). Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Framework for Assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN: 1-55963-403-0
54. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Island Press.
55. Mitra, A., & Lankford, S. (1999). "Research Methods in Park, Recreation, and Leisure Services. Illinois: Sagamore Publishing. ISBN: 1571670300
56. Moaven, Z. (2020). Therapy, spirituality, and spiritual well-being: A qualitative study of holy places tourists. Health, Spirituality and Medical Ethics, 7(1), 48-59. Doi: 10.29252/jhsme.7.1.48 [DOI:10.29252/jhsme.7.1.48]
57. Mocior, E., & Kruse, M. (2016). Educational values and services of ecosystems and landscapes-An overview. Ecological indicators, 60, 137-151. [DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.06.031]
58. Moyle, C. L., Moyle, B., & Burgers, H. (2020). Entrepreneurial strategies and tourism industry growth. Tourism Management Perspectives, 35, 100708. [DOI:10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100708]
59. Nopiyani, N. M. S., & Wirawan, I. M. A. (2021). The impact of tourism on the quality of life of communities in tourist destination areas: A systematic review. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, 9(F), 129-136. [DOI:10.3889/oamjms.2021.5966]
60. Nowak-Olejnik, A., Schirpke, U., & Tappeiner, U. (2022). A systematic review on subjective well-being benefits associated with cultural ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 57, 101467. [DOI:10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101467]
61. Orban, E., Sutcliffe, R., Dragano, N., Jöckel, K. H., & Moebus, S. (2017). Residential surrounding greenness, self-rated health, and interrelations with aspects of neighborhood environment and social relations. Journal of Urban Health, 94(2), 158-169. [DOI:10.1007/s11524-016-0112-3]
62. Peng, J., Strijker, D., & Wu, Q. (2020). Place identity: How far have we come in exploring its meanings?. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 503569. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00294]
63. Pope, E. (2018). Tourism and wellbeing: transforming people and places. International Journal of Spa and Wellness, 1(1), 69-81. [DOI:10.1080/24721735.2018.1438559]
64. Rall, E., Bieling, C., Zytynska, S. & Haase, D. )2017(. Exploring city-wide patterns of cultural ecosystem service perceptions and use. Ecological Indicators, 77, 80-95. [DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.001]
65. Ramkissoon, H., Smith, L. D. G., & Weiler, B. (2013). Relationships between place attachment, place satisfaction and pro-environmental behaviour in an Australian national park. Journal of Sustainable tourism, 21(3), 434-457. [DOI:10.1080/09669582.2012.708042]
66. Rezaei, F., Azizi, H., & Asahara, Y. (2022). Tectonic significance of the late Eocene (Bartonian) calc-alkaline granitoid body in the Marivan area, Zagros suture zone, northwest Iran. International Geology Review, 64(8), 1081-1096. [DOI:10.1080/00206814.2021.1907624]
67. Riechers, M., Barkmann, J., & Tscharntke, T. (2016). Perceptions of cultural ecosystem services from urban green. Ecosystem Services, 17, 33-39. [DOI:10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.007]
68. Román, C., Borja, A., Uyarra, M. C., & Pouso, S. (2022). Surfing the waves: Environmental and socio-economic aspects of surf tourism and recreation. Science of the Total Environment, 826, 154122. [DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154122]
69. Romanazzi, G. R., Koto, R., De Boni, A., Palmisano, G. O., Cioffi, M., & Roma, R. (2023). Cultural ecosystem services: A review of methods and tools for economic evaluation. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 100304. [DOI:10.1016/j.indic.2023.100304]
70. Sacco, P. L., & Ferilli, G. (2015). "Culture 3.0: A new perspective for the enhancement of cultural creativity." TeMA Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 8(3), 311-324.
71. Sacco, P. L., & Ferilli, G. (2015). System 3.0: A conceptual framework for the new cultural economy. In K. Oakley & J. O'Connor (Eds.), The Routledge companion to the cultural industries (pp. 520-530). Routledge.
72. Shi, Q., Chen, H., Liang, X., Zhang, H., & Liu, D. (2020). Cultural ecosystem services valuation and its multilevel drivers: A case study of Gaoqu Township in Shaanxi Province, China. Ecosystem services, 41, 101052. [DOI:10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.101052]
73. Sirgy, M. (2019). Promoting quality-of-life and well-being research in hospitality and tourism. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 36(1), 1-13. [DOI:10.1080/10548408.2018.1526757]
74. Spalie, N., Tahir, M., & Ani, C. (2011). Reconstructing sustainable outdoor learning environment in Malaysia from the understanding of natural school design and approaches in Indonesia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3310-3315. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.291]
75. Stepniewska, M., Sobczak, U. (2017). Assessing the synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services provided by urban floodplains: The case of the Warta River Valley in Pozna'n, Poland. Land Use Policy 69, 238-246.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.026 [DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.026]
76. Svіtlichna, V., Tonkoshkur, M., Cirella, G. T., Radionova, L., Yatsiuk, M., & Uhodnikova, O. (2024). Sustainable Ecotourism Development: Integrating Public Marketing, Community Engagement, and Environmental Stewardship in Ukraine. In Handbook on Post-War Reconstruction and Development Economics of Ukraine: Catalyzing Progress (pp. 271-291). Cham: Springer International Publishing. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-031-48735-4_16]
77. Taghilo, A. A., Asghari, S., Soltani, N., & Aftab, A. (2018). Analysis and Evaluation of Geotouristic Potentials of Zarivar Lake. Geography and Environmental Planning, 28(4), 17-32. DOI: 10.22108/gep.2017.98276.0
78. Tavakoli, R., & Wijesinghe, S. N. (2019). The evolution of the web and netnography in tourism: A systematic review. Tourism management perspectives, 29, 48-55. [DOI:10.1016/j.tmp.2018.10.008]
79. Tayebnia, S. H. (2020). Evaluation of Tourist Satisfaction and Analysis of Factors Affecting Their Satisfaction in West Frontier Cities of Iran (Case Study: Marivan City, Kurdistan Province). Geographical Journal of Tourism Space, 9(36), 1-18. https://sid.ir/paper/397177/en
80. Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y. M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational statistics & data analysis, 48(1), 159-205. [DOI:10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005]
81. Tengberg, A., Fredholm, S., Eliasson, I., Knez, I., Saltzman, K., & Wetterberg, O. (2012). Cultural ecosystem services provided by landscapes: Assessment of heritage values and identity. Ecosystem Services, 2, 14-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.006. [DOI:10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.006]
82. Tian, T., Sun, L., Peng, S., Sun, F., & Che, Y. (2021). Understanding the process from perception to cultural ecosystem services assessment by comparing valuation methods. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 57, 126945. [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126945]
83. Tribe, J., & Liburd, J. J. (2016). The tourism knowledge system. Annals of tourism research, 57, 44-61. [DOI:10.1016/j.annals.2015.11.011]
84. Vada, S., Prentice, C., & Hsiao, A. (2019). The influence of tourism experience and well-being on place attachment. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 47, 322-330. [DOI:10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.12.007]
85. Vert, C., Carrasco-Turigas, G., Zijlema, W., Espinosa, A., Cano-Riu, L., Elliott, L.R., Litt, J., Nieuwenhuijsen, M.J., Gascon, M. (2019). Impact of a riverside accessibility intervention on use, physical activity, and wellbeing: A mixed methods pre-post evaluation. Landsc. Urban Plan. 190, 103611 [DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103611]
86. Waechter, L. S., Luza, A. L., Eggertsen, L., Quimbayo, J. P., Hanazaki, N., Pinheiro, H. T., ... & Bender, M. G. (2023). The aesthetic value of Brazilian reefs: from species to seascape. Ocean & Coastal Management, 106882. [DOI:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2023.106882]
87. Walker, K., & Moscardo, G. (2019). Moving beyond sense of place to care of place: The role of Indigenous values and interpretation in promoting transformative change in tourists' place images and personal values. In Sustainable Tourism and Indigenous Peoples (pp. 177-195). Routledge. [DOI:10.1080/09669582.2016.1177064]
88. Wang, C., Liu, J., Wei, L., & Zhang, T. (2020a). Impact of tourist experience on memorability and authenticity: a study of creative tourism. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 37(1), 48-63. [DOI:10.1080/10548408.2020.1711846]
89. Wang, H., Dai, X., & Wu, J. (2022). Influence of urban green space on the mental health of residents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(14), 8567. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph19148567]
90. Wang, J., Luo, Q., Huang, S. S., & Yang, R. (2020b). Restoration in the exhausted body? Tourists on the rugged path of pilgrimage: Motives, experiences, and benefits. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 15, 100407. [DOI:10.1016/j.jdmm.2019.100407]
91. Wang, R., Yang, B., Yao, Y., Bloom, M. S., Feng, Z., Yuan, Y., ... & Dong, G. H. (2022). Residential greenness, air pollution and psychological well-being among urban residents in Guangzhou, China. Science of the Total Environment, 811, 152219.
92. Wang, Y., Shi, X., Cheng, K., Zhang, J., & Chang, Q. (2022). How do urban park features affect cultural ecosystem services: Quantified evidence for design practices. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 76, 127713. [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127713]
93. Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS quarterly, 177-195. [DOI:10.2307/20650284]
94. White, M. P., Alcock, I., Grellier, J., Wheeler, B. W., Hartig, T., Warber, S. L., ... & Fleming, L. E. (2019). Spending at least 120 minutes a week in nature is associated with good health and wellbeing. Scientific reports, 9(1), 1-11. [DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-44097-3]
95. White, M., Smith, A., Humphryes, K., Pahl, S., Snelling, D., Depledge, M., )2010(. Blue space: The importance of water for preference, affect, and restorativeness ratings of natural and built scenes. J. Environ. Psychol. 30 (4), 482-493. [DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.04.004]
96. Xin, C., Luyuan, L., & Pieter, U. (2020). Taking "social relations" as a cultural ecosystem service: A triangulation approach. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 55, 126790. [DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126790]
97. Zhang, K., Tang, X., Zhao, Y., Huang, B., Huang, L., Liu, M., ... & Wan, J. (2022). Differing perceptions of the youth and the elderly regarding cultural ecosystem services in urban parks: An exploration of the tour experience. Science of The Total Environment, 821, 153388. [DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153388]
98. Zhou, L., Guan, D., Huang, X., Yuan, X., & Zhang, M. (2020). Evaluation of the cultural ecosystem services of wetland park. Ecological Indicators, 114, 106286. [DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106286]
99. Zoderer, B.M., Lupo Stanghellini, P.S., Tasser, E., Walde, J., Wieser, H., Tappeiner, U., (2016). Exploring socio-cultural values of ecosystem service categories: the influence of socio-demographic factors and landscape type. Reg. Environ. Change, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0922-y [DOI:10.1007/s10113-015-0922-y]
ارسال پیام به نویسنده مسئول
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
تماس با ما
تبریز، خیابان آزادی، میدان حکیم نظامی، دانشگاه هنر اسلامی تبریز،دفتر نشریه فرهنگ معماری و شهرسازی اسلامی، صندوق پستی: 4567-51385، کد پستی:5164736931
رایانامه: ciauj
tabriziau.ac.irتلفن دفتر نشریه: 4135297551-98+
